• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Can we all agree............

Associate
Joined
3 Jul 2014
Posts
626
Location
Cheshire
If you have an i7 2600k overclocked to at least 4.4Ghz you will be wasting your money buying anything Intel has brought out after Sandy Bridge for gaming?

Yes or no?
 
Pretty much yes, whilst I never owned an sb chip. I've had Ivybridge, haswell and the devils canyon refresh of it. Improvements in gaming were practically zilch.
 
It's not as simple as yes or not for gaming. It's context dependent on exactly how you're playing games.

If you have multi GPUs and are using a high res, multimonitor or high res multimonitor then an upgrade from a 2600K wouldn't be pointless.
 
I would say no.

I found benchmarks to compared Skylake, Haswell, Ivy Bridge and Sandy Bridge 4.4GHz clock to clock in games with Titan X GPU.

5tlgyFe.jpg

Clock to clock, 2600K would be up to around 32% slower in games if compared to Skylake 6700K.

http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-2015-intel-skylake-core-i7-6700k-review
 
Back
Top Bottom