An insurance policy has been taken out on the cars but, when push comes to shove, coverage could still be denied.There are a lot of supercars on the roads with no cats which are somehow insured and pulling dodgy MOTs or putting cats back on for MOT time.
just my take but surely if you have a exhaust fitted to your vehicle that makes it illegal (ie not able to pass current mot laws) then the vehicle is not fit for the road. insurance companies will decline a payout if involved in a major accident.If you have non specific "exhaust modifications" listed on your policy then you are probably OK.
The whole "car would technically fail an mot = no insurance" thing is a massive grey area that appears in practice to err on the side of extreme caution/benefit of the doubt towards the insured.
just my take but surely if you have a exhaust fitted to your vehicle that makes it illegal (ie not able to pass current mot laws) then the vehicle is not fit for the road.
Because the Cat is a MUCH more important emissions related item vs an EGR valve...Well take my car for example, I have told the insurance company it has an EGR bypass fitted on it, they still chose to insure it. Yet the EGR valve is an emissions device, and if it's not present on the car it should fail an MOT, mine passed because the garage didn't look or care.
So in essence that's no different than not having a catalytic converter fitted.
So why is one allowed and not the other?
I'm more of the opinion that insurance companies can't condone the use of de-cats, but if the car has one and the modification is stated under more general term of performance modification I don't think they care.
Because the Cat is a MUCH more important emissions related item vs an EGR valve...
Because its an item to actually check on the MOT... and an EGR valve is not...
8.2.2. Compression ignition engine emissions
8.2.2.1. Exhaust emission control equipment
You only need to check components that are visible and identifiable, such as diesel oxidation catalysts, diesel particulate filters, exhaust gas recirculation valves and selective catalytic reduction valves.
If a diesel particulate filter has clearly been cut open and rewelded, you should reject it unless the vehicle presenter can show evidence that there was a valid reason to cut it open, such as for filter cleaning.
Defect Category (a) Emission control equipment fitted by the manufacturer missing, obviously modified or obviously defective Major (b) An induction or exhaust leak that could affect emissions levels Major (c) Evidence that the diesel particulate filter has been tampered with Major
Does anybody know if a Sports cat would suffice for an MOT test, because from reading the rules it would not because it's not fitted by the manufacturer?
Does anybody know if a Sports cat would suffice for an MOT test, because from reading the rules it would not because it's not fitted by the manufacturer?
seems difficultSports cats are great for passing a visual inspection, but try getting a pass on the MOT emissions with one fitted.
I've tested god knows how many, and short of getting them glowing red hot, they fail more than they pass.
Ah Kindai -- your true colours are genuinely beaut.Worst case, if you smash your car up totally, have it recovered to a trusted dealership first, swap the cats back on the car and then have it taken for inspection after.
Worst case, if you smash your car up totally, have it recovered to a trusted dealership first, swap the cats back on the car and then have it taken for inspection after.
so you think if your in a complete smash up with the police etc there, your car would be taken to a garage and quickly swap the cat over before the forensics see it ? no chance
Been a while, but I declared the de-cat to my insurance company. They inspected the car and paid out when someone went into the back of me, including the exhaust which was block back.