Canon 100-400mm mkii vs Sony rx10 iii/iv

[413x]

It's a shame. I can't try both. Canon 100-400mm and sigma.

leaning towards the Canon 100-400 is II.
It's a close one with a split between people saying the Canon is better than the sigma pastry 400mm. (by cropping in).
Ive certainly found all my Canon lenses fantastic. But had major issues with 120-300mm sigma.

I think I would want the sigma sport too. I'm very fussy on sharpness. Its why I got rid of the sigma 120-300 f2.8. I was rarely happy with the pics. But never had a problem with the Canon 70-200mm

So unless anyone has any compelling reasons to not go for the mk II 100-400 I'll probably get that.

Ill need to sell my sigma art as well to pay for it

Seems like the price of that lens is higher than I paid for it!

 

[413x]

Going to get the Canon 100-400mm is ii in next couple of weeks.

I didn't realise it was quite as capable at macro as mentioned. To be able to take it out and have ability to get macro Shots with 400mm for birds etc in one lens is appealing.

It won't replace my macro in sure but can do both.