Ok he's wrong too. I didn't intentionally pick one fallasy over the other. People are born superior to other people. It's utter tripe to even suggest that people are born equal.
If you mean people are born with equal rights then you're largely wrong too. Certainly in the majority of the world there is not any acceptable amount of equality. Even in the UK people are not born with equality. Some have good parents, some are born into money. Some have genetic defects.
Why don't you prove people are not born equal? Just because you're pushing opinion as fact, does not mean that you're correct nor that you have a right to debate the issue in such a rude manner.
There is nothing to suggest if given other circumstances that wayne rooney could not have been a world renowned physicist. For most of us, we can probably be whatever we want to be, and there isn't a better way to look for it.
Now I may agree with your opinion that genetic differences may give potential advantages to some people in some situations, but the simple reality is that unfulfilled potential is completely worthless.
One could argue that the early years of development are significantly more important than genetics, and it is significantly wiser to allow personalities to achieve, as opposed to those predetermined by our rudimentary understanding of genetics. Based on this, it is a far cleaner solution to presume that everyone is created equally and then judge those based on achievements after the fact.
Even if it was fair to suggest that people are not born equally, superior genetics should be last in a very long list of what makes people who they are. We're a long way from really having a strong understanding that, but do you honestly believe that your lack of tact in those posts is due to your inferior genes? Probably it's just something you'll grow out of.