[TW]Fox;19299418 said:Infact doesn't it show the downside of a Roadhawk? He's basically uploaded video evidence of the fact the accident was his fault.
[TW]Fox;19299572 said:I'd need a lot more than cash to convince me to fake an accident by getting a truck travelling at 56mph on a dual carriageway to smack into my stationary car filled with rear seat passengers![]()
I believe that footage led to the group being investigated and getting prison time for doing something like 50 scams.
[TW]Fox;19299388 said:Crikey at how many people in that Merc as well![]()
[TW]Fox;19299572 said:I'd need a lot more than cash to convince me to fake an accident by getting a truck travelling at 56mph on a dual carriageway to smack into my stationary car filled with rear seat passengers![]()
What, 4?![]()
[TW]Fox;19299637 said:I'm glad you can count, yes, 4. A lot of people to be involved in a crash![]()
[TW]Fox;19299625 said:Do you have a link?
http://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?f=10&t=923604
Topic on pistonheads relating to it last year, all i've found so far
edit - sky news link: http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/UK...t-Fraud-Investigation/Article/201011115791104
"Police believe this to be a "decoy rear end shunt" two cars are involved. Watch the video carefully. When the lorry driver pulls in to the left hand lane the Mercedes closes the gap between itself and the car in front. The VW Golf makes a sudden turn causing the Merc to brake hard. The Golf is used as a decoy to give the Merc the excuse of having to stop quickly."
Seems a bit of an extreme shunt to me though, I can understand stopping as you pull onto a roundabout, minor tap, no harm, but claim for thousands in whippy compo mayte but that is a proper smack, surely that would actually hurt you? Not convinced that was done for money - if it was, they're retarded.
I've got the roadhawk in my cars, its awesome, unfortuantely because I drive like a tool 99% of the time I can't upload any clips for fear of incrimination
not sure why my youtube links never work![]()