Don't think so - they'd probably have lost by a similar score but been harder to play againstWould a Mourinho Spurs done equally as badly as that?
Spursy still got an empty trophy cabinet
Spursy still got an empty trophy cabinet
Dont get me wrong its funny to laugh at Spurs but City cleaning up with their money isnt a good look.
United not doing anything with our money is a worse look...
You can level a lot of criticism at City for various things but they have generally spent well and ploughed money into the right areas.
They have a billion pound squad, im not sure thats spending well tbh. They have signed a lot of flops
Spent well? How many ridiculously expensive defenders have they gone through?
What team doesn't sign flops and when you are spending the money City do, those might be expensive flops.
The have spent a very similar amount on their squad to United and have got a far better first team and they have got a second team that could probably come close to top 4.
They haven't been perfect but compared to a lot of teams spending big they have done pretty well. They have a clear plan for their squad and signings and aren't just using a scattershot approach like United.
City do well with so many ‘duds’
Silva, Rodri and Mahrez have all been great signings.
Duds perhaps too strong a word but for what they are paying out for them they've hardly set the league in fire.
Ask a city fan and they will absolutely disagree about the first two. Has Rodri come close to performing as a 65 mil player?
I've heard friends talk about Rodri and Silva a lot this season and you only need to have a read through some City forums to see how highly rated they are by most. I'm not sure what you're judging them on but you're very wrong.Ask a city fan and they will absolutely disagree about the first two. Has Rodri come close to performing as a 65 mil player?