Thanks for the input.
So just under a week since I've started, I seem to have gotten into a routine and cutting down on carbs seems to be a lot easier than I was expecting. (Except the lack of fruit, I always find myself craving fruit) over the past 6 days I have been averaging around 70g of carbs a day. However most of this has come from fruit. (Also on thursday, yesterday and today I have had a banana after exercise). About 100g of fat and about 260g of protein.
How does that look?
I am doing resistance training every Monday or Tuesday and Thursday. And from yesterday will be cycling as many days as I can. About 30mins @ ~avg 15mph
Does that all sound ok ish? Not CBL as first intended but better than my previous diet/lack of exercise. (Previously did no cardio and ate about 300g carbs/90g fat and 90g protein a day)
Cheers
That to me, looks to be low enough carb to feel low on energy but not low enough to get any of the benefits of low carb! It's better than 90/300/90 (p/c/f) but something like 180/180/80 would probably be better if you're not going to carb cycle/backload properly.
Sorry to hijack this thread, but with CBL my understanding is you pretty much load up on carbs at set times, which causes a massive I insulin spike, am I right to assume this diet isn't suited to someone with a family history of diabetes and therefore is at high risk of diabetes themselves?
Correct but the flipside is massively improved insulin and hormonal response from time spent in the low carb portion. It's actually been shown to reverse or lessen T2 diabetes. Dunno about T1 as that's mostly genetic afaik? My Mother & Uncle are both T1 diabetic (from birth pretty much) and I've been practising CBL for a good couple months now with nothing but positives.
YMMV/IMO/IME etc. applies!
Last edited: