Lowe said:Cats > Dogs???
Whatever!
In a one on one deathmatch I think the cat species will win
MB
Lowe said:Cats > Dogs???
Whatever!
I say we do this pound for pound, 1 400lb Tiger vs 4 100lb Rottweilers.Matblack said:In a one on one deathmatch I think the cat species will win
MB
OCdt Stringy said:I say we do this pound for pound, 1 400lb Tiger vs 4 100lb Rottweilers.
Let the games begin
OCdt Stringy said:I say we do this pound for pound, 1 400lb Tiger vs 4 100lb Rottweilers.
Let the games begin
Good idea.VeNT said:better off with more smaller dogs tbh,
OCdt Stringy said:I still think if you picked the right breed (obviously not domesticated, I'm talking about a few ferocious frothing at the mouth specimens), then it could prove interesting.
Indeed, Rhodesian Ridge backs were bred to defend cattle against lions.OCdt Stringy said:I say we do this pound for pound, 1 400lb Tiger vs 4 100lb Rottweilers.
Let the games begin
edit: Actually, I'll try and find a better breed with which to tackle your pussy cat.
As hunters, Ridgebacks in packs of 2 to 5 kept a lion at bay while the hunters came to kill it. The dogs worked in revolving groups to keep the lion occupied until the hunter arrived; the dogs themselves did not usually kill lions, but there are stories of pairs of them being able to kill smaller/young lions, and the breed was often used to kill smaller, unwanted animals around Southern African farms. Female Ridgebacks were often used more than males as the females tended to be more agile. When not used for hunting the dogs were beloved family pets, guardians of the property and able herders.
Rubbish. Dogs have > cats since time began. Nothing has changedvonhelmet said:Proof? You don't need proof. Cats > Dogs is one of the fundamental axioms on which the universe is founded.