Cheapest to run car between £2-3k

A £1500 car that does 30mpg is cheaper to own than a £3000 car that does 50mpg you know - fuel is NOT the major cost with driving a car, it's a secondary cost and picking a car based mostly on fuel economy is how you end up with something gash.
 
[TW]Fox said:
A £1500 car that does 30mpg is cheaper to own than a £3000 car that does 50mpg you know - fuel is NOT the major cost with driving a car, it's a secondary cost and picking a car based mostly on fuel economy is how you end up with something gash.

Bingo! I swapped a £4.5k car that did 45mpg for a £1.5k car that does 30mpg and I'm much better off for it. Lower value car = cheaper insurance too :D
 
Cyanide said:
Bingo! I swapped a £4.5k car that did 45mpg for a £1.5k car that does 30mpg and I'm much better off for it. Lower value car = cheaper insurance too :D

Yep I've read that many times on here... I'll look into what a loan costs over a couple of years and then make some calculations, hang on.
 
Ok, say I get a £3000 loan - that costs me £130 per month for 2 years.

I'll be planning on doing 1000 miles per month. If I get a car that does 55 mpg, as it'll be all motorway miles, then...

I'll be using 18 gallons a month, at about £4.15 a throw (right?) which is about £75.

Say I do that for two years, that's £130 p/m for the car and £75 for the petrol. Total... £3120 car, £1800. £4920.

If I get a car that costs £1500 but does 35mpg, then... £65 / month for the car, £118 for the petrol... total £1560 car, £2850 petrol. £4410.

£500 in it over 2 years, about 20/month cheaper if I got the £1500 car.

Err... now what? :D
 
I thought they'd be suggested, but I'm only 24 and dont want to get in the old dad 406 territory quite yet! Mondeo's arent too bad but I'd rather something a bit cooler looking, which I guess fits me into the £3k stance more, right?
 
[TW]Fox said:
He said 'that isn't hideous'. I don't think a cheap and nasty plastic Hyundai is going to be enough to tempt him to spend less cash on a car.

I think it looks fine, full leather (ie, not cheap plastic), goes faster than a Corsa, nice and reliable.

Personally I'd say

coupegh4.jpg


looks considerably better than a car known to have a decent mpg -

citroen-c2-vw-lupo-4big.jpg


:D
 
Last edited:
Saytan said:
something cooler looking and being the right tool for the job, even at 3k is going to be hard to reconcile...

Well I dont mind the last style Renault Clios, they do a 1.5 dci of those, right? What are they like?

Im not looking for cool, just dont want to drive round in a barge.
 
Take into equasion that no car out there has 100% difference in price for diesel vs petrol within the same model, so those calculations are slightly flawed.

It doesn't change the fact that with current fuel prices and 12,000 miles the difference between 35 mpg and realistic 50 mpg is £32-35 a month or ~385-400 a year. Find a petrol car that's £1000 cheaper than a diesel and you're ahead of the game.

Just keep an eye on two things:
- It's not true value of the car lowers insurance quote. In my case for example a £4,500 worth of 3 litre Toyota Hilux is half cheaper to insure than 1.6 Astra Estate. In similar fashion - very often stolen Pug 306 will be cheaper to insure than unwanted, thief deterring Citroen Xantia. There is no rhyme or reason to insurance grouping and prices and don't look for one, you won't find it.

- It's not true that insuring of petrol cars is always cheaper than of diesels.

So before you buy, check all the costs twice.
 
I've always quite liked those, even though they kinda look like a hearse (in estate form anyway). I'll have a look.

Any thoughts on the REnault? Or Fiestas? I think I'm looking at small
hatches more than anything without even realising it to be honest.
 
Back
Top Bottom