Chemistry help please!

Soldato
Joined
16 Oct 2007
Posts
7,501
Location
UK
Clever OCUK,

vp3cS.png


For the first one, I'm guessing a substitution reaction occurs, with a Cl swapping with the hydroxide group. But why? Oxygen finds the Phosphorus less electronegative than the carbon, and therefore would have a greater affinity? So the negative Cl which has been kicked from the P joins with the C?

For the second one, I looked at the answers. I can't quite work out why.

For the third one, I am desperately stuck
 
Last edited:
you are right for the first one it will form the alkylchloride
the second will form the hydrochloride salt
the third will form an ester
 
The amine nitrogen is basic so will become protonated forming R-NH3+ Cl-.

The third could also form an amide depending on the sight of greatest reactivity. Both reactions occur through nucleophilic attack of the nitrogen and oxygen respectively, followed by loss of chloride and de-protonation forming HCl
 
Oh ok, didn't know that.

This reminds me I need to revise my synthesis routes.

Quick question, when you have different functional groups like OH and NH2, if you added an acid/acyl chloride do you leave the NH2 group alone?

the NH2 will always attack an electrophile first due to its lone pair, except in alkaline conditions when the OH will be ionised to O-, or in acidic conditions when the NH2 is protonated as NH3+.
 
When I went straight from doing chemistry A level, into the waste industry, I got the pee royally extracted for using systematic IUPAC names.

In industry it's always the old names.

Acetone
M.E.K.
M.I.B.K.
Toluene
Xylene
Butyl Acetate
Trike
1,1,1-Trike
Meth Chloride
Perk
IPA
Acetic Acid
Caustic (soda)

etc etc
 
christ that annoys me!

not as much as everybody spelling sulphur compounds with an f and not a ph though!!

I can't remember what they're called, but the group that essentially oversee naming of compounds decided a while back that it should be f, not ph.

Even professors who have been teaching / in reasearch for decades will have papers rejected / corrected if they spell sulfide / sulfur e.t.c with a ph.
 
I can't remember what they're called, but the group that essentially oversee naming of compounds decided a while back that it should be f, not ph.

Even professors who have been teaching / in reasearch for decades will have papers rejected / corrected if they spell sulfide / sulfur e.t.c with a ph.

yeah i have recently started using the f when writing documents, reluctantly.
 
the NH2 will always attack an electrophile first due to its lone pair, except in alkaline conditions when the OH will be ionised to O-, or in acidic conditions when the NH2 is protonated as NH3+.

So a compound with bifunctional groups (OH and NH2) will lead to the NH2 attacking the R-COO+ ? So it leaves the OH alone and produces HCl as the by-product?
 
So a compound with bifunctional groups (OH and NH2) will lead to the NH2 attacking the R-COO+ ? So it leaves the OH alone and produces HCl as the by-product?

i think you mean R-CO+ ??
but basically yes - if you were to have an amino acid (with OH and NH2) and reacted with an acid chloride you would pretty much get the amide and not the ester.
 
i think you mean R-CO+ ??
but basically yes - if you were to have an amino acid (with OH and NH2) and reacted with an acid chloride you would pretty much get the amide and not the ester.

Yes sorry that is what I meant.

Thank you very much for helping:) I normally find the exam questions hard when they have two functional groups and ask to add something.
 
Entropy gave you the right answers.

The mechanism involving PCl5, goes through the -OH group reacting first with the Phosphorus, then transfer of one chlorine to the alkyl chain, and liberation of another atom of chlorine, in general:

Ph-CHOH-R' + PCl5 -> Ph-CHCl-R' + POCl3 + HCl

Hope it helps.
 
Back
Top Bottom