Hi all,
can anyone help me, I've an exercise to do for geography and I need a little help, the problem is I don't understand Chi squared testing and have read and re-read it loads of times. Anyway I have come up with an answer for one part of the exercise which is, "This means the value for chi squared is greater than the critical value of chi squared, 46.547 > 9.48773
so there is a significant difference between the observed data and that of a random expectation.
The H0 is rejected and the H1 is accepted."
Now I kind of see that as the two numbers are vastly different, 9.48.. being the value suiable from the Chi square table. The question is for the second part, I have the same table value, 9.48773 but a clser value 11.739. I just want to know if there is a significant difference or not and whether the null hypothesis can be rejected as before, or what should I say basically...
Long shot I know but normally this forums is handy for problems so umm anyone please...?
Got till 1pm.
Thanks
can anyone help me, I've an exercise to do for geography and I need a little help, the problem is I don't understand Chi squared testing and have read and re-read it loads of times. Anyway I have come up with an answer for one part of the exercise which is, "This means the value for chi squared is greater than the critical value of chi squared, 46.547 > 9.48773
so there is a significant difference between the observed data and that of a random expectation.
The H0 is rejected and the H1 is accepted."
Now I kind of see that as the two numbers are vastly different, 9.48.. being the value suiable from the Chi square table. The question is for the second part, I have the same table value, 9.48773 but a clser value 11.739. I just want to know if there is a significant difference or not and whether the null hypothesis can be rejected as before, or what should I say basically...
Long shot I know but normally this forums is handy for problems so umm anyone please...?
Got till 1pm.
Thanks
Thanks