china thinks it can rule the world

what a laugh of course china will rule the world as long as they dont go back to those old ideas
 
neocon said:
when did the chinese last fight a war

they're a bunch of cowards
Click to expand...

More times in the last 70 years than any other developed nation that springs to mind.

Are you someone else who doesn't know what they are talking about ?
 
Stolly said:
More times in the last 70 years than any other developed nation that springs to mind.

Are you someone else who doesn't know what they are talking about ?
Click to expand...

how many people did they kill in these wars then?
 
We have always come out on top in terms of body-count, and thats what matters.

Korean War

Total:
1,271,244 to 1,818,410[citation needed]

South Korea:
227,800 dead
717,100 wounded
43,500 MIA
70,000 POW
United States:
36,940 dead (including 3,275 non-combat)
103,000 wounded
8,142 MIA
3,746 POW
United Kingdom:
1,078 dead
2,674 wounded
1,263 MIA
766 POW
Turkey:
721 dead[5]
2,111 wounded
168 MIA
216 POW Total:

1,858,000 to 3,822,000[citation needed]

North Korea:
600,000+ killed, wounded, POW, and MIA
China:[6]
114,000 killed in combat
34,000 non-combat deaths
380,000 wounded
21,400 POW
Soviet:
315 dead
500+ wounded

Vietnam War

South Vietnam
dead: ~250,000
wounded: ~1,169,763
U.S.
dead: 58,209
2,000 missing
wounded: 153,303
South Korea
dead: 4,900
wounded: 11,000
Australia
dead: 512
wounded: 2,400*
New Zealand
dead: 37
wounded: 187
Total dead: 313,658
Total wounded: 1,336,653

North Vietnam
dead: ~600,000
wounded: ~600,000
China
dead: 1,446
wounded: 4,200
Total dead: ~601,100
Total wounded: ~604,200

Second Sino-Japanese War

Casualties
China
3,800,000 military,
17,530,000 civilians
Japan
1,900,000 military (including 480,000 KIA
 
Wow some of you are really missinformed or have not done enough research to have any form of a valid argument. Yeah...the Chinese must be very weak being one of the oldest civilisations still living today.
 
Rapid-D said:
Wow some of you are really missinformed or have not done enough research to have any form of a valid argument. Yeah...the Chinese must be very weak being one of the oldest civilisations still living today.
Click to expand...

I'm talking physically, they are a very short and weak race physically, I've never seen a tall or well built chinese man. Sorry if someone thought I meant as a country they're in a weak position or whatever, clearly not.
 
Vibez said:
I'm talking physically, they are a very short and weak race physically, I've never seen a tall or well built chinese man. Sorry if someone thought I meant as a country they're in a weak position or whatever, clearly not.
Click to expand...

Yah they will get owned when the americans go into china swinging swords about..

Wake up mate..This aint lineage2...You dont need to be tall to shoot a rifle well or to operate a tank or fly a plane or even to press a button to launch missiles..
 
Vibez said:
I'm talking physically, they are a very short and weak race physically, I've never seen a tall or well built chinese man. Sorry if someone thought I meant as a country they're in a weak position or whatever, clearly not.
Click to expand...

ha ha ha.
 
Stalin said:
The death of one is a tragedy. The death of many is a statistic.
Click to expand...

Couldn't agree more with my commie friend.

Either way, in a battle with the West I don't think China would be wise to engage. They can't afford a war despite being one of the richest country's in the world, which is ironic. They only have 130 nuclear warheads. Even then their surface to surface missiles would not be able to reach mainland Europe or USA. They'd need to adapt their naval submarines to accomodate for the warheads. Even then, they wouldn't stand a chance against the UK navy as they would be detected miles of. The new Astute class subs would easily intercept and relay any information to the new Type 45 Destroyers. Now, a task force of lets say our carrier HMS Invincible, 4 Type 45 Destroyers, 6 Frigates and 4 Astute class subs would easily strike fear into any nation seeing as the Navy has the most modern tech.
 
Ricochet J said:
Couldn't agree more with my commie friend.

Either way, in a battle with the West I don't think China would be wise to engage. They can't afford a war despite being one of the richest country's in the world, which is ironic. They only have 130 nuclear warheads. Even then their surface to surface missiles would not be able to reach mainland Europe or USA. They'd need to adapt their naval submarines to accomodate for the warheads. Even then, they wouldn't stand a chance against the UK navy as they would be detected miles of. The new Astute class subs would easily intercept and relay any information to the new Type 45 Destroyers. Now, a task force of lets say our carrier HMS Invincible, 4 Type 45 Destroyers, 6 Frigates and 4 Astute class subs would easily strike fear into any nation seeing as the Navy has the most modern tech.
Click to expand...

130 nuclear warheads? where do you get that from?

Globsec said:
There is considerable uncertainly in published estimates of the size of the Chinese nunclear weapons stockpile. In the late 1980s it was generally held that China was the world's third-largest nuclear power, possessing a small but credible nuclear deterrent force of 225 to 300 nuclear weapons. Other estimates of the country's production capacities suggested that by the end of 1970 China had fabricated around 200 nuclear weapons, a number which could have increased to 875 by 1980. With an average annual production of 75 nuclear weapons during the 1980s, some estimates suggest that by the mid-1990s the Chinese nuclear industry had produced around 2,000 nuclear weapons for ballistic missiles, bombers, artillery projectiles and landmines.
Click to expand...
 
neocon said:
We have always come out on top in terms of body-count, and thats what matters.

Korean War

Total:
1,271,244 to 1,818,410[citation needed]

South Korea:
227,800 dead
717,100 wounded
43,500 MIA
70,000 POW
United States:
36,940 dead (including 3,275 non-combat)
103,000 wounded
8,142 MIA
3,746 POW
United Kingdom:
1,078 dead
2,674 wounded
1,263 MIA
766 POW
Turkey:
721 dead[5]
2,111 wounded
168 MIA
216 POW Total:

1,858,000 to 3,822,000[citation needed]

North Korea:
600,000+ killed, wounded, POW, and MIA
China:[6]
114,000 killed in combat
34,000 non-combat deaths
380,000 wounded
21,400 POW
Soviet:
315 dead
500+ wounded

Vietnam War

South Vietnam
dead: ~250,000
wounded: ~1,169,763
U.S.
dead: 58,209
2,000 missing
wounded: 153,303
South Korea
dead: 4,900
wounded: 11,000
Australia
dead: 512
wounded: 2,400*
New Zealand
dead: 37
wounded: 187
Total dead: 313,658
Total wounded: 1,336,653

North Vietnam
dead: ~600,000
wounded: ~600,000
China
dead: 1,446
wounded: 4,200
Total dead: ~601,100
Total wounded: ~604,200

Second Sino-Japanese War

Casualties
China
3,800,000 military,
17,530,000 civilians
Japan
1,900,000 military (including 480,000 KIA
Click to expand...


So according to your muddle headed view on what constitutes military success the Germans defeated the Soviets as they enjoyed victory after victory from Stalingrad through Kursk right back to Berlin.

Because its the body count that matters, not having your entire country occupied or signing unconditional surrender documents.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom