*** Christmas hotties babe image thread - *** NSFW ***

Status
Not open for further replies.
I hope we get some new stuff this year. I'll admit I'm usually the first to roll out the old favourites (iga Wyrwal back in the day was smoking), but we need some new blood
 
Most of the photos in this thread are awful, often composites with garish lighting and post processing completely unflattering to the model who ends up looking about at real as a plastic barbie doll. Such wide angle lenses are used in some of the shots they almost look fish eye.
 
This had got a bit out of hand so please remember the rules as per the original post:


Females only - If you want to post blokes, start a new thread, this is for women only.

No comedy pictures of whale sized women in Christmas clothes.

No nudity. This means no nudity either top or bottom, all of 'those' bits must be totally covered.

Must be family safe. Think of what you see on billboards, pre-watershed TV ads, etc.

Must be related to the festivities of the season, this is not a generic softcore 'babe' thread.

All watermarks must be above board. Don't want any dodgy sites being advertised here.

Play nice and this thread can continue.

Here's a new picture of Ariadna.

aeP6ucq.jpeg.png
 
Hmm so that is what a babe is today (last few pages), a far cry from when I grew up 70-90's.

Well there were some ropey "glamour models" posted earlier.... but I'd say the likes of Barbara Palvin, Alexis Ren, Taylor Swift etc... are much nicer than a 90s Pamela Anderson etc..
 
Na, none of them my cup of tea inc Pam (better looking chicks in the street or pubs when I went out) lol.

How about Kelly LeBrock in her Weird Science days (Fap, fap fap)? :D
 
How about Kelly LeBrock in her Weird Science days (Fap, fap fap)? :D

She's nice but I still prefer the current "babes" posted above...

Now if you were to say Mia Sara from Ferris Beuller's Day off or Phoebe Cates from Drop Dead Fred or Gremlins then you're talking... :)
 
I am not good with names or celebs in general (do not know most of today's so called celebs) but I am fussy and do not think most of today's so called good looking woman are good looking to me.
 
I don't really the difference between a doris in a red christmassy outfit showing lots of skin in the 70s or 80s to a doris in a red christmassy outfit showing lots of skin in 2019.
 
As I said I am fussy and I know there are different taste but none of above even the actresses I had to Google mentioned above are good looking (not ugly either) to me.

I could pick a few good lookers out in the crowds any Sat night in the 80-90's no problem.

I will let you enjoy your babes, thanks.
 
As I said I am fussy and I know there are different taste but none of above even the actresses I had to Google mentioned above are good looking (not ugly either) to me.

I could pick a few good lookers out in the crowds any Sat night in the 80-90's no problem.

I will let you enjoy your babes, thanks.

One can only assume you partake in these forums using a Braille keyboard...
 
I’m gonna take that as a typo.



Of course it’s my opinion, I can’t give anyone else’s opinion.
Tattoos are chavvy IMO, they make that girl look like a skank, again, IMO.
She’d no doubt have not the slightest attraction toward me, which is fine, as I wouldn’t give a tattooed woman houseroom.
I don't mind the ladies with tattoos, it certainly wouldn't put me off. What I really detest though is earlobe stretching and facial piercings, well piercings in general make me retch to the point where I can't make eye contact if they have a face full of ****. Highly amusing to my friends as quite a few of them are passionate about having **** in their face.:o
 
Ah... the thread of ropey "glamour" models and generic asian birds in xmas gear... time to put in a few thread savers:

Firstly Fusion's previous outstanding contributions:

Cheers dowie! You’ve reminded me for this year, I’d actually forgot this time :eek: Will get on it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom