Ciroen C4 VTR+ - Review.

Soldato
Joined
18 Oct 2002
Posts
5,060
Location
The remittance desk
Well, having just got back from ragging the living daylights out of a C4 VTR+, I thought I should share the gained wisdom from this weekend.

The car was delivered by National Car rental on Thursday, 30 minuites late I may add. 20 miles on the clock and in Silver. My mission was a little town driving and then head off to the land of the Darliods (Darlington) and pick up 3 colleagues and drive down to Wawick (220 miles). First impressions were that it wasn't a complete minger, just I wouldn't have noticed it parked up - hardly stands out if you know what I mean. I knew I was getting a 1.6 and a 1.6 it was - 110 wild ponies waiting to be unleashed!!!

Interior was the first thing that alarmed me, just after the initial 30 seconds of 'wow' wore off. It feels cheap, a massive dash with swaythes of plastic and fake carbon. There are millions of buttons and wheels. The on-board computer is confusing and, as far as I can see, useless anyway. The dispalys are centred with MPH shown in big numbers in the centre of the dash. I don't like this at all. The petrol guage is so far over, I missed it to start with! Then there is the 'computer' display. This is above the CD player and is not useful at all when driving. The best thing I found was how to disable and enable auto locks. I does display MPG, when you find that screen, something I will touch on later. The rev counter and status lights are above the centre parts of the steering wheel, which never moves, just the outside 'wheel' - slightly strange to say the least.

The level of kit as standard is great - multi-zone aircon, alloys, CD, cruise, computer, privicy glass - all great features, but there is no intuative feel about where everything is. As an example, I didn't find the Hazard lights switch for ages as the steering wheel and indicator stalks hide it and then there are the trip reset buttons, located some 3 miles away from the driver, by the speedo console, when EVERY other button is in easy reach. The lack of Sat Nav and bluetooth are a bit worrying but hey, they aren't a must.

The drive is the next let down. Citroen have managed to remove the normal suspension and replace it with a large bowl of jelly. Amazingly, they have also got the wibbly wobbly rolling wonder to detect EVERY bump in the road - even the one's you miss! It's an amazing combo of twitchy and soft ride. The brakes were designed by a man without any comprehension of physics. Even when bedded in, they dig the front of the car hard into the road, lifting the back to the point that it becomes loose and skittish under hard braking - to trouser filling level at any decent speed. The steering is reasonably responsive and the gear change is smooth and refined, though I wanted a little more feedback from the clutch in truth.

Once you get used to all the gadgets and gizmos, as well as the ride, they are ok and you can put them to the back of your mind. What you can't ignore is that woeful 110bhp engine. It requires constant flogging to get anywhere and under 4k revs is just pathetic. Why did Citreon not use the 1.616v out of the Saxo VTS? This is a heavy car with 4 adults and luggage, we will have been tipping 1550kg's and I had to spend time hunting up and down the box for the power - 5th couldn't pull a fat minger at ten to two in the nightclub, even with the offer of a free kebab first. There is no footrest either - a capital crime in my opinion!

Economy on the C4 was rather poor - i did 29.3 mpg with a bit of town driving and mostly motorway. Ok, I was in a rush but the lack of power means you have to rev it. Apparently you can do over 40, but that would be my dad driving.

On the whole, I cannot imagine why anyone with the required level of intelligence to walk into the showroom with £14,300 would actually buy this car. It's just so poor compared to the competition - the Focus blows it away. If you want economy, a 1.6TDCi is as powerful and has MUCH more torque, handles better and, although it won't have as many 'toys', they are generally a) useless or b) annoying on the C4 anyway. If you want 'sporty', you can get a 2 litre 145BHP focus for the same money. But, if you must have 'toys', the 1.6 VTEC Civic Exec has as many an is as cheap, or how about a Fabia vRS with all the options bar sat nav - and change?! Even a Mazda 3 has to be a better purchase.

I am truly sorry if you have bought a C4 - and even more so if it has a lower spec engine (the 90bhp 1.4) as it's quite a big car but, in reality, a bit pointless. The boot isn't big enough, the ride is poor, the handling is not good and there is no power.

One to be avoided.
 
There's another problem. Citroen designed that robot from the ad first, then tried to work out how they could "transform" it into some kind of car. Hence the crappy looks!

I mean seriously, does anyone actually like this thing? It's foul!
 
i think they look really good from some angles, and very normal from others...
 
Its a reasonable car in the same way the 307, Megane, focus etc are all pretty similar.

110bhp is just the engine fitting the class.... no different to any other car maker.

The 1.6 TDCi is a better choice if you more grunt, but it also costs more.
 
If the car only had 20 miles on the clock then it's hardly had time to bed in or loosen up which would explain the performance and economy

It's not good for the engine either to rag it with so few miles on the clock
 
Kitchster_uk said:
On the whole, I cannot imagine why anyone with the required level of intelligence to walk into the showroom with £14,300 would actually buy this car.
is that list?
if so it's rare to pay list price anyway.
a work colleague of mine bought a vtr+ 2 months ago on a 54 plate for £8.5k.
Kitchster_uk said:
The level of kit as standard is great - multi-zone aircon, alloys, CD, cruise, computer, privicy glass - all great features, but there is no intuative feel about where everything is. As an example, I didn't find the Hazard lights switch for ages as the steering wheel and indicator stalks hide it and then there are the trip reset buttons, located some 3 miles away from the driver, by the speedo console, when EVERY other button is in easy reach.
you could say that about any car that's effectively been designed from a clean sheet of paper.just because companies like BMW put their kit in the same place doesn't mean it's necessarily a good or a bad thing as they are conservative in their design.after all, look what happened the last time they made a controversial design move, namely the current 5 series.

unfair criticism IMHO.
Kitchster_uk said:
Economy on the C4 was rather poor - i did 29.3 mpg with a bit of town driving and mostly motorway.
hardly surprising after reading the following
Kitchster_uk said:
Well, having just got back from ragging the living daylights out of a C4 VTR
 
Kitchster_uk said:
20 miles on the clock and in Silver.
/Klaxon on
contradiction alert
Kitchster_uk said:
The brakes were designed by a man without any comprehension of physics. Even when bedded in, they dig the front of the car hard into the road, lifting the back to the point that it becomes loose and skittish under hard braking
Kitchster_uk said:
though I wanted a little more feedback from the clutch in truth.
i'm a little unsure of your exact meaning here mate can you clarify?
 
Just to answer a few questions...

The_Dark_side:

Economy was not even good on the motorway as well as when I was giving it some pasty, getting up to 35 - 36mpg. Agreed it's a new car but hey, someone buys them new.

brakes and clutch. The clutch bites and engages so quicklybut there is not really any change in the feel of the pedal. Dificult to explain, but you generally get a bit more out of most cars I've driven. The brakes were so sharp on the fron that the nose dips a long way, pulling on the front suspension, making the back end less planted on the road and thus really skittish.

The location of the kit, I agree it's personal preference but when you sit in say a 5 series BMW, things feel much more natural, again, hard to explain, but the C4 has bit on it that feel like after thoughts and that don't fit the car.

Having been out in it again today (National didn't even bother picking it up last night, when they should have...) it would be ok if this was the bottom end of the range. The trouble is, it isn't. As for the 1.6TDCi focus costing more, they don't, similar list price and MUCH better residuals.
 
Kitchster_uk said:
Economy was not even good on the motorway as well as when I was giving it some pasty, getting up to 35 - 36mpg. Agreed it's a new car but hey, someone buys them new.
true, but if you'd have driven it normally the whole time you'd have returned better figures than the one you originally posted.
although to be fair to you that's true of anyone in here.
Kitchster_uk said:
brakes and clutch. The clutch bites and engages so quicklybut there is not really any change in the feel of the pedal. Dificult to explain, but you generally get a bit more out of most cars I've driven. The brakes were so sharp on the fron that the nose dips a long way, pulling on the front suspension, making the back end less planted on the road and thus really skittish.
i find too many cars like this to be honest with you and i would level this criticism to way more than the Citroen marque.
everything is so damped, balanced and neutralised these days.
this is almost certainly what the average punter wants, although people like you and i are NOT average punters.we're keen drivers and as such we HATE compromises in a car.
face it mate, it's not the C4 that's broken...it's you and i ;)
Kitchster_uk said:
The location of the kit, I agree it's personal preference but when you sit in say a 5 series BMW, things feel much more natural, again, hard to explain, but the C4 has bit on it that feel like after thoughts and that don't fit the car.
i think that the germans tend to put ergonomics much higher up the list of priorities, i can't argue with you at all there.what i meant was, say BMW, have found their preferred site for the hazard button and that's it.other marques have looked at companies like beemer and merc enviously and are at last realising that even things like this matter to even joe public.
renault 5 headlight stalk anyone? :p
Kitchster_uk said:
Having been out in it again today (National didn't even bother picking it up last night, when they should have...) it would be ok if this was the bottom end of the range. The trouble is, it isn't. As for the 1.6TDCi focus costing more, they don't, similar list price and MUCH better residuals.
hey, they left you the car for a while longer for FREE, don't knock it :D
again i have to agree with you RE residuals, although to be honest that's true of all Citroens when compared to a manufacturer with a larger market share like Ford.
as for your other point this is something that annoys me constantly.
don't you feel that nowadays they design the top of the range car, then work out what to remove for the lower spec models?
with older cars i always felt that they designed the base model then worked out what extra's to add should you want to spend a few extra pounds.
what's your opinion on this?
 
The_Dark_Side said:
don't you feel that nowadays they design the top of the range car, then work out what to remove for the lower spec models?
with older cars i always felt that they designed the base model then worked out what extra's to add should you want to spend a few extra pounds.
what's your opinion on this?

My opinion on this is that base models suck anyway and anything that can be done to make life more miserable for the cheapskates which buy them (Can't afford an SE but can afford an 06 plate, yea right) should be.

Everyone else can just buy the range topper :p
 
Back
Top Bottom