26 Feb 2009 at 16:15 #21 chuck990 chuck990 Associate OP Joined 7 Dec 2008 Posts 1,391 Location UK stability, though not required, is better than a dangerous and stupid overclock no-one would really want
stability, though not required, is better than a dangerous and stupid overclock no-one would really want
26 Feb 2009 at 17:11 #22 porta porta Associate Joined 1 Nov 2007 Posts 276 chuck990 said: stability, though not required, is better than a dangerous and stupid overclock no-one would really want Click to expand... I take it you don't bench then.
chuck990 said: stability, though not required, is better than a dangerous and stupid overclock no-one would really want Click to expand... I take it you don't bench then.
26 Feb 2009 at 17:36 #23 Happy Happy Soldato Joined 7 Jan 2008 Posts 7,117 Location Tunbridge Wells CPU: Q6600 @ 3.7 Voltage: 1.52 Max Temp: 76C IBT (Have NB and PWM/Mosfets before the CPU in my loop:/)
CPU: Q6600 @ 3.7 Voltage: 1.52 Max Temp: 76C IBT (Have NB and PWM/Mosfets before the CPU in my loop:/)
