Sirrel Squirrel said:Nope it all stayed on the drives, all stored in the states![]()
For how long?

Sirrel Squirrel said:Nope it all stayed on the drives, all stored in the states![]()
Rebelius said:Where did all the data come from,
Sirrel Squirrel said:Forever I think, it cost Sony millions.
The project is over now though but we still encode about 80tb a day for various television networks, a new program would come in on tape, it'd be encoded and it can then be played out without tapes.
The first commercially-available Petabyte Storage Array was launched by the EMC Corporation in January 2006, with an approximate cost of USD 4 million
Fergie said:1 PB Storage array will set you back $4 million. Ultimate willy waving if you have the cash!![]()
Rebelius said:what I want to know is... you know when CERN & Caltech broke the network speed record with some ridiculously huge transfer speed - Where did all the data come from,....
Sirrel Squirrel said:It's not just for VOD, it's also for transmission as a tapeless transmission environment runs a lot smoother where everything is file based, also means fewer people are needed to run it.
Tomsk said:I'm surprised nobody's said the obvious.
GD standards must be rising.![]()
Fergie said:1 PB Storage array will set you back $4 million. Ultimate willy waving if you have the cash!![]()
Darg said:Nonsense:
http://img441.imageshack.us/img441/3029/1pbfa3.png
£260,651.82 incl. VAT.
Talk about supporting OCUK... would make a nice rendering farm
And yes I know there are server options for this kind of thing but I was testing how much it would cost to buy a 1PB farm from OCUK![]()
Rotty said:We have a new storage unit being released soon which will be in the region of 1 Petabyte with sequential transfer rates of 24GB/s and a Terabyte of cache