• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Conroe and X2 comparison

Gangster said:
Does anyone know if running a divider on the conroe is a performance killer?

G


it may hurt performance. they should have used on die memory controller. then the cpu would be truly a power monster.
 
NathanE said:
The three key reasons are:

- More execution units (like 3 vector units, as opposed to just the 1 on NetBurst and the A64)

- Pipeline optimisations (compresses certain instruction groups down to one instruction)

- Shared L2 cache (allows cross core communication without hitting the FSB, and hence allows threads to switch between cores with no penalty)

- Black magic that Intel won't ever disclose

Great thanks.

So its a bit like Pepsi, with the most important ingredient being top secret?
 
Dr Pepper > Coke > Pepsi


Obviously the 6600 is the one to get but what is a 6300 equalivant to at stock, is it still in fx beating country?


And there is an even cheaper version thats 800fsb, except I dont see that on ocuk?
 
silversurfer said:
Dr Pepper > Coke > Pepsi
Coke > Pepsi >>> Dr. Pepper (which tastes rather like urine.)

silversurfer said:
Obviously the 6600 is the one to get but what is a 6300 equalivant to at stock, is it still in fx beating country?
I've been looking at some benchmarks today and it seems that he E6300 lags just a tiny bit behind the FX-62 at stock, but I dare anyone to say that's not incredible value for money. The E6400 is equal, maybe a tiny bit better, while the E6600 and X6800 are just miles ahead.
 
I was just looking at someone on xtreme who has clocked his 6300 to 6700 speed which is pretty impressive, 50% overclock.

There isnt any 20x multipler chip, theres a grid showing all the models on one of these threads and theres no sign of anything like that unfortunately. So to overclock needs expensive ram and a good motherboard it seems
 
Gangster said:
Does anyone know if running a divider on the conroe is a performance killer?

I doubt it. The Conroe is pretty similar in design to the Pentium-M (short pipelines, etc.) That made the P-M a low-bandwidth design, so it performed perfectly fine on single-channel 333Mhz DDR. If you're running eg. dual-channel 800Mhz DDR2 with Conroe, I think it's gonna have more bandwidth than it knows what to do with, divider or not. It's certainly not like the P4 which had a long pipeline and was very dependent on bandwidth - that's why dividers on P4 are such a pain.
 
Back
Top Bottom