• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

CONROE BUSTED !!!

Status
Not open for further replies.
easyrider said:
Im not saying that its the second coming lol.

Im saying that a conroe that costs 125 quid can spank an FX 62 with a small overclock.

All will do 3ghz with the right mobo.
Thats some serious speed.

Indeed it can. A lot of the 3800+ can clock higher than the FX62 on air as well, though not as easily i grant you.
I was just taking issue with your figure of 3.4ghz with ease. A lot of the ES seemed too but the retails don't.
"3ghz with the right mobo" is not quite "3.4ghz with ease" that is all i am saying. :)
 
Kamakazie! said:
Indeed it can. A lot of the 3800+ can clock higher than the FX62 on air as well, though not as easily i grant you.
I was just taking issue with your figure of 3.4ghz with ease. A lot of the ES seemed too but the retails don't.
"3ghz with the right mobo" is not quite "3.4ghz with ease" that is all i am saying. :)


I agree completely with both your points - it really bugs me when everyone insists on comparng a cheap chip to the most expensive when its well known the opposing cheap chip can get to as high a clock speed.

I personally think most retail 6300's can get to 3.1 - 3.2GHz on reasonable air coolers (or should that be under) but thats about the limit. Still a 50% clock anyway and phenomenal for that figure alone

Will be interesting to find out if different mobo's really do make that much difference
 
its another ****** thread about the argument that has long past

conroe is better, lets all have a ****

at the end of the day amd will soon bring out a better chip then it will alllllll change, then intel a better one then amd then intel then amd then intel then amd then intel.

cant you see were all sick of squablings between which is better and by how much.
 
conroe is the better CPU on the market now, but its very very hyped up, too much IMO, and before someone says 'conroe is sooo much faster than my old system' get a grip and think logically. example 'my pentium 166 is faster than your commadore', another 'my PS2 is SOOO much faster than my PS1' how often do you see new technology that doesn't improve on past technologies, its a new CPU with totally new architecture and intel not talking out there arses so much for once in there existance, still doesn't change the fact that it'll be obselete in a very short time, just like everything else..
 
taz488 said:
its another ****** thread about the argument that has long past

conroe is better, lets all have a ****

at the end of the day amd will soon bring out a better chip then it will alllllll change, then intel a better one then amd then intel then amd then intel then amd then intel.

cant you see were all sick of squablings between which is better and by how much.

give me a rifle with loads of ammo and i'll shut up all these 'conroe is false', 'conroe is god' thread spam ;)
 
Yes lets keep this thread tidy please gents :) Conroe is a good CPU, there's nothing to rival it performance wise at the moment, thats about all that needs to be said.
 
My God ! What Demons have I stirred up, so many ramblings just for One Thread. Mother always told me not to make trouble. Mr Moderator PLEASE delete this thread :p
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom