I've never understood why "petrolheads" seem to despise convertibles.
I just read the 911 Turbo Cabriolet article on Pistonheads and there are quite a few comments which echo this. Similar response to the last episode of Top Gear.
Now I can understand that on many cars such as the 911, chopping the roof off compromises structural rigidity but in reality is this actually true or only something an OCD purist would claim to notice? Even this doesn't explain why petrolheads still slate cars like the Boxster which have been designed from the ground up to have no roof.
Then you have those who say they're 'hair-dresser' or 'camp.' Wake up and smell the coffee, nobody buys an LP560-4 Spyder worrying that they'll look gay and I suspect most of the time the sort of people who buy them are doing so for the image rather than the driving experience and thus the convertible would tick more boxes anyhow.
I just read the 911 Turbo Cabriolet article on Pistonheads and there are quite a few comments which echo this. Similar response to the last episode of Top Gear.
Now I can understand that on many cars such as the 911, chopping the roof off compromises structural rigidity but in reality is this actually true or only something an OCD purist would claim to notice? Even this doesn't explain why petrolheads still slate cars like the Boxster which have been designed from the ground up to have no roof.
Then you have those who say they're 'hair-dresser' or 'camp.' Wake up and smell the coffee, nobody buys an LP560-4 Spyder worrying that they'll look gay and I suspect most of the time the sort of people who buy them are doing so for the image rather than the driving experience and thus the convertible would tick more boxes anyhow.


Visibility and a general feel of being out in the elements no car without a drop top can match.