Welcome to the hypocritical UK. We struggle to climb the housing ladder and once we're up there we kick it away to stop the poors below us getting a chance.
Typical case in point: The estate I live on went up in the late 90's. The vast majority of people on it then objected to a new estate going up the other side of the 'B' road we turn off for the usual reasons
@FoxEye mentioned (no new amenities etc) - every single one of which would have been equally applicable to our houses. Planning permission did go through after the council (allegedly) pulled a few shenanigans.
I refused to support the campaign and when challenged I pointed out my kids will be priced out the market when people act like this. They're certainly going to be reliant on elderly relatives leaving them something in wills.
Solutions:
- The green belt rules are not fit for purpose any more. They're mostly "protecting" crap. What was right in the 1950's isn't right now. The focus for no building should be our genuinely beautiful countryside under the areas of outstanding natural beauty designation, not scrub land, farms and golf courses on the edge of town.
- Proper commitment to building homes at national and local levels. The industry never invests because each project is possibly the last so there's no incentive to try new things, invest in skills etc.
- No tax discounts for second homes. You're rich enough to buy one, pay the full whack. I don't care if your bins only need emptying 4 times a year, pay up.