• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

CPU codenames

Soldato
Joined
12 Nov 2002
Posts
14,600
Location
In my own little world
started looking into codenames for CPU because i was getting confused and there's tons :(

Appaloosa: This was to be the 0.13-micron-process version of AMD's Duron (i.e. a Duron version of the current Athlon XP Thoroughbred, akin to the Duron/Morgan version of the old Athlon XP Palomino).

Banias: Intel's next notebook/laptop CPU, a battery-thrifty design which it hopes will elbow aside the mobile Pentium 4 (actually, the Banias core reportedly resembles the older, still marvelously efficient Pentium III) started in the first quarter of 2003.

Barton: The next version of AMD's Athlon XP; successor to the "Thoroughbred" Athlon XP 2700+ and 2800+. Barton is built on the same 0.13-micron process, but doubles the on-chip Level 2 cache from 256K to 512K, so pundits predict a roughly 10-percent performance boost.

ClawHammer: Cool jargon for the desktop and mobile versions of AMD's forthcoming Hammer processor, scheduled to ship under some new variant of the Athlon brand in the first half of 2003 and moved from an 0.13- to 0.09-micron process in the second half of the year. For servers and workstations, there's two-way ClawHammer DP version marketed under the Opteron label.

Deerfield: Sort of a 64-bit Celeron -- a forthcoming economy version of Intel's Itanium (actually Madison), with 1MB of Level 3 cache.

Dothan: What'll be inside "Intel inside" notebooks in the fourth quarter of 2003 -- the 90-nanometer-process successor to the forthcoming 0.13-micron Banias mobile CPU, reportedly to use the same 400MHz system bus but hike the Level 2 cache from 1MB to 2MB.

Foster: The Xeon (server and multiprocessing) variant of Intel's 0.18-micron-process Pentium 4 Willamette.

Gallatin: A jumbo-cache (1MB or 2MB Level 2) upgrade of Intel's P4-sibling Xeon for multiprocessor servers.

Hammer: The generic name for AMD's long-awaited, eighth-generation, 64-bit processor, arrived in the first half of 2003. Unlike Intel's start-from-scratch 64-bit Itanium series, Hammer (a.k.a. K8) also runs existing 32-bit programs at top speed, without having to switch into an emulation mode. See ClawHammer, SledgeHammer, and Opteron.

Madison: The 0.13-micron-process successor to Intel's 0.18-micron process Itanium 2 (McKinley), with 6MB of Level 3 cache (Intel says a staggering 288 million of Madison's even more staggering 500 million transistors will be cache SRAM).

McKinley: Intel's Itanium 2 server CPU, an 0.18-micron-process whopper with 32K of Level 1, 256K of Level 2, and either 1.5MB or 3MB of Level 3 cache.

Merced: The first of Intel's Itanium 64-bit processor family.

Morgan: The current (1.0GHz through 1.3GHz) AMD Duron economy processors, basically 0.18-micron Palominos with one-quarter as much L2 cache (64K).

Nehalem: successor to Intel's Prescott and Tejas; unlike them, it'll represent a clean break from the Pentium 4 line -- the next blank slate, so to speak, in Intel's 32-bit processor progression. Gossip says it'll debut on a 90-nanometer and then switch to a 65-nanometer process, with a clock speed of 1.8 googolhertz.

Nocona: The server flavor of Intel's Prescott; it'll succeed the current Xeon version of the Pentium 4.

Northwood: Intel Pentium 4 desktop processor, built on an 0.13-micron process with 512K of Level 2 cache. Runs at 2.8GHz with a 533MHz front-side bus; a 3.06GHz chip with Intel's Hyper-Threading technology -- which fools software into thinking that a single-CPU system is a two-chip multiprocessor platform, yielding (Intel says) a performance gain of up to 25 percent.

Opteron: The trademark AMD will use for multiprocessor server and workstation versions of 2003's Hammer CPU.

Palomino: AMD's first Athlon XP (the XP 1500+ through 2100+), which succeeded the Athlon "Thunderbird" in October 2001. Equipped with 128K of Level 1 and 256K of Level 2 cache, it's built on an 0.18-micron process.

Prescott: Intel's desktop Pentium 4 from Northwood's 0.13-micron to an 0.09-micron (90-nanometer) manufacturing process, just as Northwood succeeded the 0.18-micron Willamette. Best guess for its debut clock speed is 3.2GHz, with fanboys already hoping for 4.0GHz and 1MB of on-chip Level 2 cache. The Pentium 4's front-side bus, which has evolved from 400MHz to 533MHz, should step up to 667MHz with Prescott.

Prestonia: Intel's current Xeon, the server-duty sibling of the 0.13-micron Pentium 4 Northwood, with the same 400MHz and 533MHz system buses and 512K of Level 2 cache. When it appeared last February, it was the first CPU to implement Intel's Hyper-Threading scheme.

SledgeHammer: The industrial-strength multiprocessing (up to eight-way) or enterprise server version of AMD's Hammer 64-bit processor.

Tejas:leaked codename for the enhanced successor to today's Pentium 4 successor Prescott.

Thoroughbred: Affectionately abbreviated as Tbred, this is AMD's current Athlon XP desktop processor, built on an 0.13-micron process (versus the 0.18-micron process of Palomino) with 128K of Level 1 and 256K of Level 2 cache. Debuted with the Athlon XP 2200+ (June 2002); swiftly revised and enhanced with the "Thoroughbred B" core of the Athlon XP 2400+ and 2600+ (August/September 2002); boosted further by stepping from a 266MHz to 333MHz front-side bus with the Athlon XP 2700+ and 2800+ (November 2002).

Tualatin: The last, best revision of Intel's Pentium III desktop processor, with 0.13-micron process architecture and a hefty 512K Level 2 cache. The Celeron/1.1A, /1.2, /1.3, and /1.4 value CPUs are Tualatins with 256K of L2 cache and a 100MHz front-side bus.

Willamette: The original, 0.18-micron-process version of Intel's desktop Pentium 4 processor, available initially for 423-pin and later for 478-pin (same as the current 0.13-micron Northwood) sockets and equipped with a 400MHz front-side bus and 256K of Level 2 cache. The current 1.7GHz and 1.8GHz desktop Celerons are actually Pentium 4 siblings, Willamette chips with only 128K of L2 cache; the 2.0GHz Celeron is ditto with 0.13-micron manufacturing, making it a CeleNorthWillaron.

Conroe

Kentsfield

Windsor

Brisbane

Barcelona

Woodcrest

Cloverton

Clovertown

have to excuse half the descriptions are out of date, how many more are there ?

MW
 
Plenty more.

Presler, Smithfield, Yonah, Merom, Kentsfield, Venice, San Diego (or Venus for Opties), Manchester, Toledo (Denmark for opties), Winchester, Palermo, Windsor, Ceder Mill, Paris. There's bound to be more. Those are a few more that came to mind and weren't on that list.

Mul
 
Prescott: Intel's desktop Pentium 4 from Northwood's 0.13-micron to an 0.09-micron (90-nanometer) manufacturing process, just as Northwood succeeded the 0.18-micron Willamette. Best guess for its debut clock speed is 3.2GHz, with fanboys already hoping for 4.0GHz and 1MB of on-chip Level 2 cache. The Pentium 4's front-side bus, which has evolved from 400MHz to 533MHz, should step up to 667MHz with Prescott.

Thats just wrong... Northwood C had already achieved a FSB@800, also one of the 'best' of the Pentium 4 generation. Dont think any of the Prescott's had a 667FSB, they were 800mhz, just like Northwood C. Dunno if they made any 'cut down' versions with a 533FSB.

The info on Northwood is also wrong, It debuted at 2Ghz, and intel quickly released a slightly cheaper 1.8Ghz version.. As you said, the first HT northwood was the 3.06Ghz. Northwood A had a 400mhz FSB, Northwood B had the 533, and Northwood C had 800mhz. All northwood C's (2.4/2.6/2.8/3.0/3.2 and even a 3.4Ghz) had Hyperthreading enabled.

Gallatin core was also used in the first P4 Extreme Editions for socket 478.

Allendale, Core 2 Duo with 2Mb Cache, basically a cutdown Conroe. True allendales are the E4300s, as the E6300 are just butchered Conroes.

Penryn, 45nm shrink of Core2, with SSE4 and a few other tweaks added. Conroe only has SSSE3 (Yes, 3 S's its an updated SSE3)
 
Last edited:
There was a prescott at 533mhz, don't think there was a 667 one.

Some more, Coppermine - P3 from 400 to 1200. Klamath - P2 from 200 to 400 (i think). Mendocino - Celeron from 333 to 533.


Nice list here.
 
Last edited:
I had a 600mhz Katmai, it was quite a hot running processor, quickly replaced by the coppermines. Pretty much the same performance though, so I stuck with the Katmai.
 
Few more from memory, so may be some minor errors:

-Coppermine: P3 with 256k fullspeed cache aka P3 'E'. Primarily s370.
-Katmai: P3 with 512k halfspeed cache. Available in both slot1 and s370
-Mendicino: P2 Celeron with 128k fullspeed cache AKA Celeron 'A'
-Thunderbird: Socket A Athlon.
-Spitfire/Morgan: Durons, can't remember the difference
-Sharptooth: AKA K6-3, basically a K6-2 with more cache
 
Phnom_Penh said:
There was a prescott at 533mhz, don't think there was a 667 one.

Some more, Coppermine - P3 from 400 to 1200. Klamath - P2 from 200 to 400 (i think). Mendocino - Celeron from 333 to 533.

Yeah I remember there being some dodgy Prescott 'A' running at 2.4ghz or something like that.

Coppermine only ran from 500-1.13ghz (with the 1.13ghz version infamously getting recalled).
Mendicino definitely went as low as 300 because I used to have one :)
Not sure on Kalmath speeds (slowest was deffo 233) but I remember it was superceded by Deschutes which (maybe) started around 333
 
You should also split them up into amd and intel

im sure wikipedia has lots of information on the codenames
 
Corasik said:
I had a 600mhz Katmai, it was quite a hot running processor, quickly replaced by the coppermines. Pretty much the same performance though, so I stuck with the Katmai.
I had a slot1 Katmai running at 450MHz, swapped that out for an FC-PGA Coppermine 550MHz and overclocked it to 733MHz!

Can't remember the details of the cache size? but I think it was 256KB but the Katmai run at 1/2 speed and the Coppermine ran at full speed (I think?)

Codenames are good, I think the first one I knew was Deschutes, before that I just knew the shelf name i.e Pentium 133MHz etc . . .
 
Don't forget Littlefoot (AMD K6 200-300MHz) and Chomper (AMD K6-3D 233-550MHz) ! - named after Land Before Time characters (how cute!)
 
I think it will be hard for anyone trying to work out all the codes for chips from the past, but if u pay attention it should be fairly easy to take note of the CPU's out now and the future ones.

I suspect most recent users of these forums will know what Northwood and Prescott are, also Clawhammer, Newcastle, Venice and San-Diego, only thing of note since then has been Allendale and Conroe! ;)
 
Back
Top Bottom