• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

CPU for my daughters PC

Associate
Joined
22 Dec 2002
Posts
1,190
Location
Teesside, UK
Hey folks,

My daughter is getting more and more into recording both games (minecraft) and handycam recordings of her arty things such as clay modelling. A few video recordings later using the trial of Sony Vegas Studio she is fed up with the rendering speed. for a 10 min video it's taking between 1 to 2 hours. I've watched a few guide video's on rendering to 720p for Youtube but I can't seem to speed things up. This is just as slow using Live Movie Maker.

Don't want her to feel discouraged so thinking a better CPU might help. She's currently using my old gaming rig from many years ago with one of the original Intel Core Duo's from about 2006 ish.

Hardware she currently has
Old 1st gen Core Duo
Ati 1950
4gb Ram
Windows 7

I realise a motherboard upgrade will be needed too. Just wondering where to start on a low budget. Cheaper the better but would like to see a huge difference. She likes the occasional game besides minecraft, so ideally it should be able to play anything recently, but I assume a GPU upgrade will take care of this another day. Namely when I upgrade my current card.

Can't put an exact figure on the budget for both the CPU and Motherboard, but thinking under £170.
 
For that budget, your best bet is probably this CPU, this board and this RAM. However, if you can stretch to a quad core i5 2300/2400, then the overall performance will be a lot better.

For the graphics you could either reuse the existing card, or use the HD 2000 graphics which is built into the CPU. Also, this mobo/CPU combination supports quick sync - so if she moves onto more advanced software (like Adobe Premier elements) then this technology can be used to really boost encoding performance.
 
Here is a review which compares the i3 2100 and i5 2400 in a range of applications - including video editing apps. This page shows the performance of these CPUs in Sony Vegas (a widely used video editing app).
 
Thanks for the excellent benchmarking link. This will be the first time I've ever purchased PC hardware without games in mind so it's certainly an interesting read when video encoding is the priority rather than frames per second at particular resolutions.
 
What's the board? It might take a Q6600.

Core Duo was never released as a desktop platform afaik. You must be talking about the original C2D chips, conroe or allendale.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intel_Core#Overview


Yes is is a Conroe that she currently has. I always thought this was a duo chip, but thanks for pointing it out. I'll check the exact motherboard and see if it's compatible with the Q6600
 
id say a phenom x6 would be good as editing software will usually use the extra 2 cores making it near i5 2500k performance, in multithreaded apps for less money, id also reccomend 8gb of ram which can be bought for under £40
 
yes I'll be upgrading her PC in a couple of weeks so I'll definitely take the new CPU into account. The suggestions so far look great. Nice to know there are plenty of options with a fairly low budget.
 
Overlocked Q6600 (if possible) might be a nice cheap and relatively hassle free option, i.e. just slot it in no need to worry about swapping out the mobo, buying different RAM, potentially reinstalling windows etc (potentially an issue with a child's PC as you can never be sure exactly how they have it setup). Push it past 3ghz and it should be very competitive vs an i3 for video encoding due to having double the cores.

edit: if you do end up buying new I'd definitely go something with more than 2 cores, as mentioned a phenon X6 with 8GB DDR3 might be a good starting point.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom