Crysis 2 Graphics Comparison

Gerard · 24 Jan 2011 at 22:16

Pc dx9 vs 360

Not really sure where the pc footage came from. :confused:

Seems to run quite smoothly on both though.

'Wes · 24 Jan 2011 at 22:38

Looks like CoD online.

mame · 24 Jan 2011 at 22:38

Hmm PC version looks a bit better.

Darg · 24 Jan 2011 at 22:42

Hard to tell how it really looks like with a youtube video. Also pity it's not running on very high. High seems to work on an old PC so very high DX11 should hopefully run on an up to date nv 470 or ati 5870 GPU.

MrElve · 24 Jan 2011 at 22:42

PC Definitely looks better.

wedgie · 24 Jan 2011 at 23:00

Far more interested in visual quality/performance Vs the original Crysis, I don't think it's absurd to hope for an improvement on both counts.

arknor · 25 Jan 2011 at 00:40

lets show of a 1080 res pc version on a 720res youtube video LOL

great comparrison!

unknownsock · 25 Jan 2011 at 01:27

Looks like a clone of COD to me..

Judgeneo · 25 Jan 2011 at 01:47

Aye it looks very similar to COD.

PC version is definitely better, but it was only on high, and DX9 so we shall see how smooth and good it looks at the higher settings.

Looks very good for a 260 card though

Calneon · 25 Jan 2011 at 02:56

If it runs like that on high on a 260, looks like my 280 still has a lot of life left

.

hdpcgamer · 25 Jan 2011 at 05:55

I'm surprised how close both versions look based on the footage it doesn't appear to be direct feed so its dificult properly compare the two.

Is the PC version also locked at 30fps because both seem to being running at the same framerate?

Amnesia · 25 Jan 2011 at 06:21

was he moving around faster in the pc version ?
anyway hard to tell the graphical difference when the video is 720p and the xbox version is running at 720p.....so the higher pixel count on the pc version is wasted in this vid.

shaffaaf27 · 25 Jan 2011 at 06:54

can't see the youtube video embeded on the post. When was the video uploaded?

Tefal · 25 Jan 2011 at 06:58

either the guy plays on his pc with a game pad or that's not the pc version.

Skellig · 25 Jan 2011 at 07:26

The two look pretty comparable to me. Would rather see Enthusiast settings on the PC though.

shipinabottle · 25 Jan 2011 at 10:47

suspicious minds, why on earth is he running it on a 260...

I'm still expecting a much more optimised game, so will be purchasing this, and if the online combat is akin to COD but without the stupid fisher-price perk system then ill be satisfied that I'll have an engrossing single player (I actually enjoyed the first) and a multiplayer that I can pop on now and again.

TheCenturion · 25 Jan 2011 at 10:55

I can't actually see the video, youtube is blocked

I imagine that it would be difficult to get the console version to the graphics settings of the pc original, due to the fact that they're working with a 4 y/o gpu

But could someone tell me if the pc version look better than the original?

Thanks

opethdisciple · 25 Jan 2011 at 11:12

Judgeneo said:
Aye it looks very similar to COD.

PC version is definitely better, but it was only on high, and DX9 so we shall see how smooth and good it looks at the higher settings.

Looks very good for a 260 card though

Bang on the money. And why not? They smeel blood and a gap in the market. The COD series is currently in decline. MW2 and BO have brought it to new lows.. and this is giving an oppurtunity to the Battlefield community or any other Dev to step in to the market slowly receding from Activision.

I say all the better. It means that Activision will be underpressure to make sure that MW3 is indeed the successor to COD4 and we all win.

Complacancy breeds stagnation and lethargy, competition, and we get innovation and quality!

Bring it on.

FlukeRogi · 25 Jan 2011 at 11:13

Quality of the video isn't good enough to do either version justice really.

twist3d0n3 · 25 Jan 2011 at 11:59

agree with it looking like CoD....

but yes, it's impossible to tell the visual quality with that level of blocking on the yootoob vid...