Crysis and its graphics....

[J.D]

I personally think Dead Space 2 and Far Cry 2 look better, although i do place things higher when they are running at a smooth and constant frame rate, just makes it all seem flashier and shiny somehow.

Dead Space 2 . I've not even started the first one lol.

 

[DarrenM343]

On a 260GTX OCX Maxcore, Quad core 6850 and 64-bit vista Crysis plays very well.
I personally was very disappointed with STALKER Clear Sky release recently. That game only uses one core of a processor which is just not on these days, and graphics just aren`t good as you have to turn things down. After 2 days of playing Stalker I returned to Crysis and it was like 'WOW - amazing graphics'.

 

[willhub]

Don't think Crysis looks that good on Medium settings tbh

 

[starfighter]

It is amazing graphics, they obviously just went all out to create the best engine ever after the success of FarCry.

My 8800GT could run it OK, my 48701gb it is lovely.

The graphics card market was very stagnent at the high end afer the 8800GTX for almost 2 years! I bet Crysis didn't expect that, if things had carried on it wouldn't have been as bad.

I am glad that atleast some companies have faith in the PC, and for that reason aloone I will buy it, UT3 is possibly the next nice engine but it looks like it was designed for consoles imo. Crysis is just leages ahead. I cannot wait for more games to use the engine.

 

[starfighter]

Don't think Crysis looks that good on Medium settings tbh

run it on high then. IT was obvoiosly intended to be ran at high/ very high.

 

[willhub]

run it on high then. IT was obvoiosly intended to be ran at high/ very high.

Lol you don't think I ever ran it on medium do you surely? I run it on high/ better than very high with CFG's.

Don't play it anymore though, no point, got boring ages ago.