Ulfhedjinn said:How Not To Release A Game: -
1.) Duke Nukem Forever
2.) S.T.A.L.K.E.R.
3.) Crysis
Flibster said:It's very pretty. But what does that matter? HL2 was pretty, Fear was pretty... Neither were much good really.
Simon/~Flibster
vonhelmet said:Whereas Far Cry was pretty and awesome.
I concede that the other two were less than thrilling, Fear in particular being a raging borefest.

Was Prey really that late?HangTime said:No big deal, not like Crysis is the first game to get delayed. Certainly wouldn't put it 3rd on the list
Prey? 9 years late
TF2? 8 years late and counting

shocking behaviour!! it is an absolutely awesome game. Far Cry on the other hand... mleh, pretty good but nothing special. i think the sparkly blue water and shiny green leaves got to everyone
.Sort of.... it was not in development for most of those years. Think it had a total development time of about 5 years from conception to release.Carl_Bennetts said:Was Prey really that late?
there is looking forward to something and there is waiting years...for a game?!? I just have gone beyond caring... it looked ready for release aswell. In 2008 I bet it wont even look that great in comparison to other titlesbfar said:Better to get it when it's ready. We're all sick and tired of getting buggy games anyway. These decisions are made for good reason.
There's quite a lineup for next year anyway. Hopefully we'll get a couple of surprise titles in the meantime![]()
. We waited and waited and then sept 06 was the next release date so it would have missed summer. So stupidly we think xmas hols... bargain. then before xmas hols happens we hear next year march ish?
..... why?
