Crysis with Vista SP1 is way better performance

such rubbish. remember when XP came out? there were loads of problems, it didnt become the fine OS you know until SP2. just because people are using it after the release of the newest OS doesnt mean anything :confused:

people dont like change. they have used it for 6 years and dont want to mess up their carefully tuned OS's.
you will be in the same position when the next one comes out. clinging to Vista saying the same thing. just because XP is a good operating system (after 6y years of updates) doesnt mean Vista is any less of a system after 1 year.

i prefer it a lot over XP and im very glad i changed. :)

Not sure if this tirade was aimed at me, but for the record I run Vista and have done ever since an upgrade 6 months ago. Just because I no longer use XP doesn't mean to say that I don't think it's a great OS, however. So the 'position I will be in when the next one comes out' may be slightly different than you perceive. The trouble is with forums like these that people often expect other users to see everything in black&white, picking sides and if they express support for one product it means they must hate the rivals! :)

The point I was driving at, is that while I am conservative in some regards (e.g. sticking with Windows classic theme), I am NOT adverse to change per se. I got Win2kpro, WindMill and WinXP as soon as they were available, because I wasn't happy with the previous version of Windows. But WinXP was a different kettle of fish, I found it to be highly stable and reliable and I wasn't hunting for the next big thing anymore. It's got nothing to used to me not wanting to change and mess up my tuned OS, it was more a case of me not having any problems with WinXP, for the first time ever. Even if Vista had been released back in 2003 I would have felt the same way.

In the end I made the move to Vista because I owned a DX10 card and was doing a mobo/cpu/ram upgrade so it seemed like a good time to go with the OEM version (given that I wouldn't be doing a major upgrade for a couple of years).

Personally I dispute this myth about XP being overly problematic prior to SP2, sure, some people had issues no doubt but even pre-SP1 I found it superior to Win2kpro and WindMill. Yeah, so driver support was a little shaky from some quarters initially but better from Win2k.
 
I would say about 15% it is the same as XP performance now i know that is a bold claim lol but it is true may be a little better than XP just a little tho.

tell this to these jackasses who keep having a go at me for slagging off 64bit vista

i'll try this by the way
ta
 
Unfortunately I wont be able to switch to Vista full time untill either Microsoft or Nvidia get their fingers out and fix the nvlddmkm.sys error :(.

That's the exact reason i switched back to xp, that bloody error!!!

Loved vista but by god was that error annoying blue screening whenever it felt like it
 
I've been running it for a day so far, haven't noticed anything untoward. Archive/copy performance seems to have improved (e.g. when downloading large files in IE, and it copies from temp location), but that could just be a placebo.
 
Unfortunately I wont be able to switch to Vista full time untill either Microsoft or Nvidia get their fingers out and fix the nvlddmkm.sys error :(.

As much as I like Vista, it's look and it's operating environment I won't switch until either MS or Nvidia sort out the lack of horizontal span for multi-monitor users.
 
i just tried this, and hes right, the performance is definately better. it is playable at my monitor's native resolution 1920x1200 now, rather than having to play in a tiny window. for some reason though my sound stopped working after installing SP1, but i dloaded some new creative drivers which fixed it.

i updated to SP1 (not tryed anygames yet) and i got the static sound bug , but i just updated the drivers for my xi-fi (was running the offical vista 64bit driver iso) and all is fine again
 
Back
Top Bottom