CSA: Another point of view

~J~

~J~

Soldato
Joined
20 Oct 2003
Posts
7,558
Location
London
I don't often (in fact don't think I have ever!) posted 'personal' issues on here, and while I'm not after advice as such, am trying to understand an alternative point of view on what I and other finds to be an incredible situation.

I'll keep to the facts, you should get the jist of everything:

Started with employer in January 2008
May 2008, CSA granted "Attachements of Earnings Order" for £655.29pcm
June 2008, first attachment was due.

October 2008, I receive a phone call from CSA to say payments not coming from Employer, can I investigate.
October 2008, CSA confirm payment of 'approx' £1100 from employer.

June 2009, I receive another phone call from CSA to say they've only received one payment from employer, way back in October 2008.
June 2009, my employer changes company name to a different one - the way he did this was as a "Pheonix company" (you may have heard of this)

July 2009, I receive phone call from CSA asking where I work now seeing as my employer has gone into liquidation! I say it hasn't, just changed name.

August 2009, another phone call from CSA saying employer is under investigation and £5000 fine for none payment being issued.

September 2009, receive a phonecall from Criminal Investigation Officer asking me for formal interview with all payslips to confirm the deductions have been made from my wages. Same person informs me that my employer claims all cheque stubs from 'old' company have been lost and company not responsible for debts; therefore I'm still liable for June 2008 to August 2009 payments at £655.28pcm minus the £1100 received in October 2008!!!! :eek:

September 2009, CSA issue new Attachment of Earnings order for 'new' company name, sure enough money deducted from my wages.

Today...

Get another call from CSA saying they've still not received payment, despite ANOTHER fine for £5000 and correct Attachment of Earnings order to new company name. They say they've spoken to my employer who is refusing to pay and thus they are taking crimminal proceedings.

Now out of all of this, the facts are as follows:

Despite the Attachment of Earnings order being granted, this order only forces my employer to pay direct to the CSA a fixed amount of money from my wages - they are not liable for the debt - I still am, so despite nearly over £7000 paid over the duration, I'm still liable for it.

The CSA are catagorically stating that they've received NO payments other than the £1100 in October 2008.

My employer is saying without question he's sending the cheques off, it's the CSA at fault* (asterisk that!!)

The accountant confirms that on the 19th of every month, the CSA rings to confirm the amount to be deducted, the accountant makes a note, writes a cheque for the boss to sign but does NOT see that cheque again.

* - If this WAS true, it doesn't answer the single £1100 payment made on October 2008 which isn't 2x£655.28p

End of conversation today was that the Attachment of Earnings order is now being stopped and that I've to make the £655.28p payments myself over the counter at a HSBC bank.

In the meantime however, the CSA are continuing to chase the debts from June 2008 but have warned me (advised?) that if my employer pulls the "Company no longer exists, debts have gone with it" approach, that I should make a personal lawsuit against him. THAT'S gonna put me in one hell of a situation, and ultimately what will it achieve if the companys debts are wiped off!

But all that aside, can anyone offer an alternate insight into what may be happening?

Half of me thinks my boss is nicking the money, but then again for a company it's not THAT great deal of money!

If the above is true, over 10mths he'll pocket £6550 pounds, but has lost £5000 with the fine.

Why the 'odd' amount sent in October 2008, it's as if it was a token payment.

At a total loss!
 
Cant really advise on your situation much but, after suffering at the hands of this crowd for 14 years, i kept all contact, payments etc in my control. That way i had proof of what was being paid and when. Thankfully my case is now closed but you do have my sympathies
 
So long as you can prove that the employer has deducted the cash from your wages you must be in the clear. If an attachment of earnings order was made, the whole thing was out of your control, so you've no responsibility for it

Personal lawsuit against your employer - what a load of tosh - when companies go bust, the Revenue don't chase individual employees when they can't recover unpaid PAYE & NI that the company's deducted from your salary

As for your employer being fined £5,000 - that may be correct but I bet he hasn't paid it yet

The £1,100? I reckon your employer sent them a cheque to keep them happy....or a more likely explanation is CSA incompetence

Jeez £655 a month?...and I thought I'd done something hideous in a previous life to deserve their wrath - you haven't got a red face, horns and a pointy tail, have you? Eat with a trident? Have a brazier in the corner of your lounge for burning human hearts while your victims look on? :p

You may view this as either a good or bad thing, but does that mean your ex and kids have only got £1,100 for the last year?
 
I am having terrible trouble with these at the moment although as my sons are now with me it is me doing the claiming. Useless is all i can say.
 
If the deductions are on your wage slip and proven via bank statements then you should be speaking to authorities.
 
From hearing such stories as this, I feel very lucky to have never had the CSA in close proximity to my life.
 
This is what happens when "both parents are responsible for supporting offspring of the marriage until the age of 18" is enshrined in law (or the cohabiting rule)... something that needs to be reconsidered given the incompetence and arrogance of government departments?
 
Who on earth manages these worthless bunch of knobs? I seem to hear nothing but disasterous stories regarding them. Surely if they are so inept then someone needs to intervene?
 
How many kids are you paying for as that seems like an awful lot of money.

Worst thing is if the mother is on benefits she dosent see anything of it
 
So long as you can prove that the employer has deducted the cash from your wages you must be in the clear. If an attachment of earnings order was made, the whole thing was out of your control, so you've no responsibility for it

Personal lawsuit against your employer - what a load of tosh - when companies go bust, the Revenue don't chase individual employees when they can't recover unpaid PAYE & NI that the company's deducted from your salary

As for your employer being fined £5,000 - that may be correct but I bet he hasn't paid it yet

The £1,100? I reckon your employer sent them a cheque to keep them happy....or a more likely explanation is CSA incompetence

Jeez £655 a month?...and I thought I'd done something hideous in a previous life to deserve their wrath - you haven't got a red face, horns and a pointy tail, have you? Eat with a trident? Have a brazier in the corner of your lounge for burning human hearts while your victims look on? :p

You may view this as either a good or bad thing, but does that mean your ex and kids have only got £1,100 for the last year?

Well although employer has deducted wages, I'm not in the clear as the debt is with me, not my employer, the AoE was just an enforcement to make sure money got to them (which is wasn't)

The £5000 fine, no you're right, it wasn't paid because he used the "company doesn't exist" no more excuse, so that was null and void.

As for the £1100 last year, yeah it basically means my ex and daughter (just one kid) received £1100 from the CSA even though they should have had over £7500.
 
Theres something wrong there mate, for one child its 15% of your income you have to pay, and thats reduced by a seventh for every night they stay with you

Have a read of this because over £600 is a lot unless youre early 5k a month :p

http://www.csa.gov.uk/en/PDF/leaflets/new/CSL303.pdf

Not if you're on the old case which I am, that's 30% of income and haven't seen her for 8 years. But yes, a lot of money.
 
No, long story, there's loads of people on 30%, just get moved on when they've time unfortunately.

Old rules suck!

I believe we are due to be moved over in 2011.


When can I move to the new rules/new system/new way of sorting out child maintenance?

A. On current plans, the Commission expects to introduce the new 'gross income' scheme in 2011.
 
Is there nothing you can do to get on the new system? Maybe ask for it to be reviewed?

IIRC for this to happen quickly the recipient has to close the case and reapply after a 13 week interval. Not very likely if she's trousering £600+ a month...
Otherwise its just when they get around to reviewing it. Given the massive backlog that could be years away.

A friend has never received a penny in 14 years through them, despite her ex working full time as a store manager. I'm not sure how he fiddled it but he managed to get his entire income declared exempt under the old rules, so somehow ducked out of approx £120K up to the daughter turning 18. She's still pursuing it, but I doubt she'll ever see any of it.

My own partner has two kids from her previous marriage and we get the rather pitiful sum of £224 a month from her ex. Well, we're supposed to receive it - despite an attachment of earnings we've still only received one payment since the end of June.
 
IIRC for this to happen quickly the recipient has to close the case and reapply after a 13 week interval. Not very likely if she's trousering £600+ a month...
Otherwise its just when they get around to reviewing it. Given the massive backlog that could be years away.

A friend has never received a penny in 14 years through them, despite her ex working full time as a store manager. I'm not sure how he fiddled it but he managed to get his entire income declared exempt under the old rules, so somehow ducked out of approx £120K up to the daughter turning 18. She's still pursuing it, but I doubt she'll ever see any of it.

My own partner has two kids from her previous marriage and we get the rather pitiful sum of £224 a month from her ex. Well, we're supposed to receive it - despite an attachment of earnings we've still only received one payment since the end of June.


That is a lot more than the £2.50 a week my ex said she would give me for 2 teenage boys!
Ok, she does not work but she was getting an income from a second house she owns.Imagine my surprise when i saw that she had sold it for £275k this week!
 
I think you need to talk to your boss. Thing is, if he is taking the cheque and signing it and its supposedly being paid across then the cheques are also being deducted on the accounts side and showed as having gone, it would be difficult to trouser the money, especially over such a long period of time unless he was planing on doing the same again and no real accounts are ever going to be done.
 
I think you need to talk to your boss. Thing is, if he is taking the cheque and signing it and its supposedly being paid across then the cheques are also being deducted on the accounts side and showed as having gone, it would be difficult to trouser the money, especially over such a long period of time unless he was planing on doing the same again and no real accounts are ever going to be done.

This is the problem I have, I've spoken to him and while I shouldn't really say, he is a bit of a 'geezer' and forever doing questionable things in the business.

What I just can't understand, just can't quite work out what's going on in his mind his why he's doing it. I've approached him, told him what's going on and I'm told that he is sending the cheques off and that he'll speak to the accountants about it. When I go back to him I get told "It's all sorted now", yet several days/weeks later the CSA phone up to say payment isn't received.

I have checked the legalties and I am actually still liable for the debt, so as it stands now, where I should have paid off about £3500 in CSA debt over the last year or so, I'm now further IN debt by nearly £7500 of which they're starting to hammer down on me.

Just trying to look at what motive he's got by not sending the cheques off, if he can benefit from it, if in his silly little mind he's trying to help me (how I don't know seeing as the money is coming outta my salary), and just can't make out what's going on.

I just don't see, other than a little bit of interest, what benefit he's got by not sending money off, and with £5k fines coming in, he's losing out anyway.

It's weird one.
 
Back
Top Bottom