*** Cyberpunk 2077 ***
- Thread starter Neil79
- Start date
Such low faith from too many people lol. CDPR said previously in an interview I recall that the target was 60fps. I cannot imagine any form of adequate gameplay especially during firefights and car chases of which there appears to be many from 30fps in those scenes. Likewise the reviewers who played the first 16 hours (as well as those who played the first few hours previously) would have mentioned if it was 30fps as 30 and 60 are night and day difference.
I do not believe for one second that anyone will need a 3080 to hit 60fps at their respective spec level for each gfx preset.
Also CDPR aren't some average joes, they would not put out such a moderate spec requirements list and then nVidia endorse it if they weren't confident. I fully expect nVidia has played a heavy hand in getting it looking and running well considering DLSS2.0 is being used and we already know that's at least a 20fps gain on top of whatever is achieved with just RT enabled.
Soldato
- Joined
- 14 Mar 2011
- Posts
- 5,442
Cyberpunk hype got you all cross eyed there mrk?
Haha... Exactly... these are the people I worry about when the game doesn't reach into their living room and perform life saving open-heart surgery on their relatives (with optional genitalia modification, naturally)... "I've got so much of my identity tied up in this game now, it can't be less than perfect or that means I'm flawed too?!?!"
Associate
- Joined
- 14 Jan 2013
- Posts
- 1,392
- Location
- Horsham
Bloody hell that was deep
Soldato
- Joined
- 14 Mar 2011
- Posts
- 5,442
Stupid I know, but good to have hyperbole on both sides... have legitimately heard people say things like:
"This is literally the game I've been waiting for my entire life" (uh-huh)
or
"My big worry is that after playing this I won't ever be able to enjoy any other games again because they will just seem so inferior in comparison" (mm hmm)
Every concern raised is met with a litany of finger-in-ear lalalalalala game is going to be perfect etc. it just gets a bit tiresome
Let's not get overdramatic now. I've already played and thoroughly enjoyed probably one of the best game series I will ever play in my life (Last of Us) and I know that it's going to be very hard for almost any other game to match up to that level of storytelling and immersion with all those little details in the game go because Naughty Dog do things no other dev has been able to do yet.. At least as far as my interests in what makes a game great for me goes.
I don't have any set expectations for 2077 other than a visually grand SciFi shooter with deep RPG. The RPG bits are not really my type of thing in games any more but the SciFi aspect will keep me interested no doubt. My comments are obviously all based on what I've read and seen.
I think it's a shame that so many games end up being a let down at launch that the default expectation of many here is that the next AAA game must be a let down too because they fear disappointment rather than dealing with it /if/ that situation arises, you know how adults are supposed to do things.
I don't have any set expectations for 2077 other than a visually grand SciFi shooter with deep RPG. The RPG bits are not really my type of thing in games any more but the SciFi aspect will keep me interested no doubt. My comments are obviously all based on what I've read and seen.
I think it's a shame that so many games end up being a let down at launch that the default expectation of many here is that the next AAA game must be a let down too because they fear disappointment rather than dealing with it /if/ that situation arises, you know how adults are supposed to do things.
Caporegime
- Joined
- 9 Nov 2009
- Posts
- 25,462
- Location
- Planet Earth
Well if I can get close to 60FPS at 1440p(or even 1080p with resolution scaling ) with a GTX1080 on medium settings that is fine for me. I am more interested in the RPG elements and the world building - if it is a decent RPG game it should be replayable over several years. I can always turn up graphics on another playthrough when I have a better system.
Associate
- Joined
- 24 Nov 2013
- Posts
- 475
Pretty much my thoughts
I have a Titan Xp (2 actually but second will be of no use) which is quite old now so not expecting to be able to crank things up much. I used to be a graphics w***e but can't justify the expense nowadays when there are so few decent games around.
Well I guess it's only 16 days to go so we will all find out collectively 
I managed 45-60fps in RDR2 on all ultra settings 3440x1440 so if that's the case with 2077 too with RT then I'll be happy. Happy with 2560x1080 too of course having gamed at that res extensively on other graphically intense games too.
I managed 45-60fps in RDR2 on all ultra settings 3440x1440 so if that's the case with 2077 too with RT then I'll be happy. Happy with 2560x1080 too of course having gamed at that res extensively on other graphically intense games too.
Well I guess it's only 16 days to go so we will all find out collectively
I managed 45-60fps in RDR2 on all ultra settings 3440x1440 so if that's the case with 2077 too with RT then I'll be happy. Happy with 2560x1080 too of course having gamed at that res extensively on other graphically intense games too.
What GPU do you have Mrk? I'm currently still using a 1070 @ 2560x1080 I'm hoping I can get a 6800 series or a 3070 before the year is out or early next year when theres more stock.
Well I guess it's only 16 days to go so we will all find out collectively
I managed 45-60fps in RDR2 on all ultra settings 3440x1440 so if that's the case with 2077 too with RT then I'll be happy. Happy with 2560x1080 too of course having gamed at that res extensively on other graphically intense games too.
I'd settle for that too, I find 45 fps to be eminently playable on most games, so as with you anything 45+ and I will be content.