*** Cyberpunk 2077 ***
- Thread starter Neil79
- Start date
I only played it once and that was on release. Also played the expansion once.
It just is not calling me play again. Something hollow about the game. Loved it on release and great for first playthrough, but they did not do enough for repeat gameplay. Forvme anyway.
Might play it again at some point, just not anytime soon
It just is not calling me play again. Something hollow about the game. Loved it on release and great for first playthrough, but they did not do enough for repeat gameplay. Forvme anyway.
Might play it again at some point, just not anytime soon
TBH I am playing it for the expansion (but not skipping right to it), all the story stuff was top notch from memory, the side stuff is hit or miss really, a lot of filler but some good stuff you can find off the beaten path left in journals and stuff.
But I know from your bare bones BG3 play through, man doesn't stop to read anything that isn't the main quest
Only mods I'm using (dependencies excluded) are Nova City 2 (custom weathering and lighting) and the HD reworked project ultra quality.
Last edited:
It's one of the best games ever, never understand when people say this game is shallow etc. it's incredibly deep with various play styles, crafting, skill tree, great side stories (that are better than a lot of main game stories) and a huge interesting world to explore. Even on my first playthrough on launch with a vega 56, I didn't encounter any serious bugs and likewise on my second playthrough with the 3080.
On a slightly separate note somewhat related in the same sense, I have noticed some people saying gaming is terrible and shallow now, all just pretty visuals yet we have had some of the best games ever in the last few years, people seem to think games were better before RT/PT
Arguably it was worse, a lot worse, had some long periods where gaming was dry with **** all to play.
On a slightly separate note somewhat related in the same sense, I have noticed some people saying gaming is terrible and shallow now, all just pretty visuals yet we have had some of the best games ever in the last few years, people seem to think games were better before RT/PT
Arguably it was worse, a lot worse, had some long periods where gaming was dry with **** all to play.
Agree thoroughly.
Mind you it's easy to miss the depth if you don't care to invest time and interest into it. Once you do you start to see how far some of the tendrils go.
I feel it's subjective re depth. Like I wouldn't say it's shallow but I wouldn't call it incredibly deep at all.
And that's fine, not everything has to be incredibly deep to be enjoyable. Also a lot of stuff was aded after people already played it so that may have had an impact.
I'm sure everyone has their own subjective yardstick for measuring such things.
I'm currently trying it with 4x fg but I think I'm going to have to disable it again because I'm getting pop in (not sure if that's related but it seems to be random objects) but the visual artefacts annoy me when I'm not in combat.
Also, I guess it's nice that my PC isnt kicking out loads of heat but then it is a bit nippy right now
And that's fine, not everything has to be incredibly deep to be enjoyable. Also a lot of stuff was aded after people already played it so that may have had an impact.
I'm sure everyone has their own subjective yardstick for measuring such things.
I'm currently trying it with 4x fg but I think I'm going to have to disable it again because I'm getting pop in (not sure if that's related but it seems to be random objects) but the visual artefacts annoy me when I'm not in combat.
Also, I guess it's nice that my PC isnt kicking out loads of heat but then it is a bit nippy right now
Last edited:
I feel it's subjective re depth. Like I wouldn't say it's shallow but I wouldn't call it incredibly deep at all.
And that's fine, not everything has to be incredibly deep to be enjoyable. Also a lot of stuff was aded after people already played it so that may have had an impact.
I'm sure everyone has their own subjective yardstick for measuring such things.
I'm currently trying it with 4x fg but I think I'm going to have to disable it again because I'm getting pop in (not sure if that's related but it seems to be random objects) but the visual artefacts annoy me when I'm not in combat.
Also, I guess it's nice that my PC isnt kicking out loads of heat but then it is a bit nippy right now
Yup it's nothing like KCD 2 for example in terms of "deepness" (which is good imo, utter borefest that, just like the first one). A lot of people seem to think the game is just a pretty nvidia PT showcase though, which it is far from.
FG x3 is the sweetspot for most games, 4x does work well but you need the base fps to be about 70/80, that and a 240hz monitor to see/get the most out of 4x.
I'll try that thanks. Worst is flickering UI elements, But again, when I'm in combat and everything's going fast I am not noticing these things. It's when I'm going about exploring and suddenly a bin pops in or something.
I don't recall seeing a three times option, so I'm guessing it's something I need to force through the Nvidia app or something, or maybe it was and I just didn't notice
There definitely is a 3x option.
Game assets popping up will be down to the game, sadly, that is cp 2077 main drawback, draw distance.
I recall there was something weird where there was like a big industrial fan very far away on a building and it looked absolutely terrible and then I moved one step forward, and suddenly it rendered properly but you could get between the two states
Fellow #RTXON gamers rejoice, for dlss was already superior compared to native for many years, however, with the new m model and performance mode, not only is it leaving native in the dust but it is also better than dlss quality preset k. WHAT A TIME TO BE ALIVE! This is true #finewine
Time to replay Cp 2077
Time to replay Cp 2077
Last edited:
Associate
- Joined
- 19 Jan 2021
- Posts
- 578
hmm the evidence Ive seen [Daniel, Hardware unbound] has Preset M is a few % slower in C2077 there is a quality improvement on but unless you are running PT mode its not worth it. However early days
Depends on the gpu and what res you are at, nvidia did state it would run slower on 20xx and 30xx and weaker 40xx/50xx. Although I have also seen some saying that this beta driver is slower across the board too so it may resolve in the final release.
Either way, performance with m looks and performs better than dlss quality k and native so may as well use it as the default now.
Also, it seems to work even better with frame gen this new preset too although not seen many comparisons on this side of things with frame gen yet....
Associate
- Joined
- 19 Jan 2021
- Posts
- 578
the tests I was referring to for C2077 were with 50 series cards, but we will see
Try yourself and see what works best. Based on my testing in a few games, dlss performance m is going to be my go to now even if the fps was good with dlss quality.
Computerbase have done their testing now (although not cp 2077 but more games than HUB for example)
Reddit - The heart of the internet
www.reddit.com
Associate
- Joined
- 19 Jan 2021
- Posts
- 578
Will need to update 100+ mods, thats not a trivial task, will take most of a weekend morning