Would you all be wasting your time arguing with a flat earther?
Edit: cause climate change denier is in the same category.
Lets be fair, he's not denying it, just downplaying it and not giving a damn because it won't be him that suffers.
Would you all be wasting your time arguing with a flat earther?
Edit: cause climate change denier is in the same category.
You're off the mark as usual and have missed the point being made.This is a new level of Meism for Lightbulbguy.
'Ah well as long as the human species survives long enough for me to have my nice stuff and then die, screw anybody who follows and any other species."
Straight out the Putin playbook that one.
Not me-ism, just existential nihilism
Also from the BBC:![]()
Putin: Is he right about wind turbines and bird deaths?
The Russian president has warned against too much reliance on wind power.www.bbc.co.uk
As wind energy has grown in popularity, reports of birds killed by wind turbines have become more common. Few studies have investigated the phenomenon, but estimates suggest that between 10,000 and 100,000 birds are killed by turbine blade strikes annually in the UK.
I think
Do you base a person's opinion on something on what they do for work?![]()
True. Still not worth engaging with, imo, both mind sets are closed and irrational. You’d get more sense having a debate with a scarecrow.Let’s be fair, he's not denying it, just downplaying it and not giving a damn because it won't be him that suffers.
Which then logically leads to the conversation here. If life has no implicit meaning, then why do we bother making things more difficult for ourselves trying to preserve it or prevent change in our environment?
Irrational is the complete opposite of what it is. Its perfect rationality and logic. What's irrational is emotion.True. Still not worth engaging with, imo, both mind sets are closed and irrational. You’d get more sense having a debate with a scarecrow.
Humans have been displaced in one form or another for thousands of years.human displacement.
Because there would be no control otherwise and there would be anarchy. As a collective species we tend to value stability.If life has no implicit meaning, why do we make things difficult for ourselves with laws and rules vis-a-vis ethical nihilism?
Not in slightest its a random forum where **** posting is name of day. I just comment when someone is being condescending when they have no reason to be.
If Diddums was a PhD holder with specific focus on deep sea mining he could allow himself to be more pointed....but he's just a random person so saying he shouldn't have to explain to someone is just cringe.
Why?Coming from you, that is beyond hilarious.
whatever helps you get through the day dude.Irrational is the complete opposite of what it is. Its perfect rationality and logic. What's irrational is emotion.
Humans have been displaced in one form or another for thousands of years.
Agreed.
Do you disagree with these statements?
1. Good and evil are nebulous, and values addressing such are the product of nothing more than social and emotive pressures. (Ethical nihilism)
2. Life has no intrinsic meaning or value (Existential nihilism)
Because they seem pretty spot on to me.
Which then logically leads to the conversation here. If life has no implicit meaning, then why do we bother making things more difficult for ourselves trying to preserve it or prevent change in our environment?
It is ultimate absolute logic which is why I like it.
Doesn't mean we can't decide to do things and make changes. But lets not kid ourselves - we are doing it for us, not for 'the planet'. If the planet had a conscious it might well prefer just to have green plants on it and nothing else.