-
Notice regarding image hosts and attachments. See here.
Poll: DELETED_74993
- Thread starter DELETED_74993
- Start date
- Status
Soldato
- Joined
- 24 Nov 2002
- Posts
- 16,376
- Location
- 38.744281°N 104.846806°W
They are - but I didn't label them either way.
I was purporting to the morals of the situation.
Soldato
- Joined
- 24 Nov 2002
- Posts
- 16,376
- Location
- 38.744281°N 104.846806°W
Soldato
- Joined
- 9 Jun 2005
- Posts
- 4,698
- Location
- Wiltshire
The moment I heard it I said, "sounds like some ocuker"
Since when are the Taliban insurgents? I don't know why it seems so hard for some people to grasp, they need to be destroyed as far as im concerned
and if you have to ask why, then well... I don't think you're fit to be arguing the point.another day another troll reporting to mods, if you dont have anything to say on the topics subject dont post its simple
no it would not because if you bother to read the resolution you wanted to make the war legal unlike your last few wars you would realise it does not call for gaddafi to go.
if you cared about civilians you would make that ceasefire happen instead of encouraging the fighting to continue which is against everything the UN resolution is about
Last edited:
Caporegime
- Joined
- 18 Oct 2002
- Posts
- 37,798
- Location
- block 16, cell 12
Its not morals it just dpeends whether we like who they are fighting or not.
Go back to soviet era afganistan? we certainly helped the insurgents there. Not for moral reasoning but because we were repulsed by the thought of the growth of the communist machine...
Soldato
- Joined
- 22 Feb 2010
- Posts
- 5,347
- Location
- Southampton
no trolling intended - mearly that you are so supercritical of our libya involvement to the point that no one wants to argue with you about it
anyway this is in GD - if you want a seroius discussion that what Speakers Corner is for
yes its going to end in a mess, and no one knows how long its going to take,
but if we hadnt have got involved a very very terrible thing would have happened on our doorstep and we would have just watched on tv which would have been criminal
the resolution does not call for gadaf to go - but that doesnt mean its illegal for us to want him to ?
Last edited:
surely its illegal for nato and the countries claiming to be carrying out the UN resolution to not actually be enforcing a no fly zone but using it as an excuse to bomb anything that moves and threatening to continue until gaddafi is gone regardless of wether the fighting stops or not.
the odds are he will still be in power after obama , cameron etc have gone.
go read some of the comments on the skynews article , the atitudes have changed and most people arent in favour of whats going on anymore compared to a few weeks ago when everyone was very pro rebel
the odds are he will still be in power after obama , cameron etc have gone.
go read some of the comments on the skynews article , the atitudes have changed and most people arent in favour of whats going on anymore compared to a few weeks ago when everyone was very pro rebel
UN resolution never said anything about a no fly zone, the resolution says that we need to protect civilians ... from anything
including rebels attacks yet they dont and the majority of stuff bombed isnt anywhere near a danger to civilians they are using it as an excuse to bomb all sorts.
soon they will run out of military targets and move on to any form of goverment building so the country can be no longer run.
gaddafis palace was a target because he was aparently using it for communications.
by that logic they could cruise missile his mobile phone as an excuse for an assasination
soon they will run out of military targets and move on to any form of goverment building so the country can be no longer run.
gaddafis palace was a target because he was aparently using it for communications.
by that logic they could cruise missile his mobile phone as an excuse for an assasination
Soldato
- Joined
- 24 Nov 2002
- Posts
- 16,376
- Location
- 38.744281°N 104.846806°W
Er no.
Soldato
- Joined
- 24 Nov 2002
- Posts
- 16,376
- Location
- 38.744281°N 104.846806°W
Soldato
- Joined
- 22 Feb 2010
- Posts
- 5,347
- Location
- Southampton
It doesnt seem that the rebels are actually involved in much fighting - they seem to head west when an airstrike takes place until they meet oposition when they fall back east again so not much danger other than to themselves
they have only bombed military targets (certainly ones they thought were military targets anyhow)
who said they were going to bomb government buildings ? no one has and that would not be in line with the resolution
gadaffis palace was not a target - a command and control centre in the grounds was, this show us that they are being very careful to show that they could have flattened his whole compound if they chose too but are only taking out military targets
they only way they can target gaddaffi is if he happened to be at a military site or in a tank
Last edited:
wow i just go over to tyhe skynews website and spot the latest breaking news headline
truly awful how could such a massacre take place
Hardly a massacre tbh....unless you would class a couple of people getting killed a massacre??...now if it was a lot more like 10+ then sure call it a massacre.
Personally i dont class anything less than 10 people being killed as a massacre.
Anyhow back OT...the only way Gaddafi is going is by a coffin...if the UK et al think that bombing his country is going to make him leave then sadly they are mistaken....this is just another Iraq/Afghanistan waiting to happen...why are we there??...for the oil again??...to protect our interests there??...or are we there to help save the people and put in a Pro-West govt
??...hmmmmhow come anyone kill by gaddafi forces is always refered to as "people"
is it because the average person will then assume its civilians beeing killed like the propaganda tells us?
because if it were civlians they surely would not be refered to as people?
is it because the average person will then assume its civilians beeing killed like the propaganda tells us?
because if it were civlians they surely would not be refered to as people?
Soldato
- Joined
- 22 Feb 2010
- Posts
- 5,347
- Location
- Southampton
because they are people ? even gadaffi is a person ?
so 8 people get blown up by their own government and your reaction is rolleyes? nice
Misratah sounds like another Sarajevo
spawn - not sure if you have bothered to read this thread but the points you have rasied have been answered about 50 times each already
so 8 people get blown up by their own government and your reaction is rolleyes? nice
Misratah sounds like another Sarajevo
spawn - not sure if you have bothered to read this thread but the points you have rasied have been answered about 50 times each already
Caporegime
- Joined
- 18 Oct 2002
- Posts
- 37,798
- Location
- block 16, cell 12
wow i just go over to tyhe skynews website and spot the latest breaking news headline
truly awful how could such a massacre take place
The allies probably kill between 3-5 men with every tank they take out! why should they care about 8 people so much id never know!
Im just bewildered as to why we are so engrossed and so active in this campaign at all.
If we wanted to do a proper job we should just have bombed gadaffi instead of doing this all by proxy.
Thats all it is to stoke up some hatred against gaddafi.
These UN USA boys are doing hitler proud !
- Status