Dirty Winker!

Their system is compromised because the uni has used incompetent staff which have either configured the security groups incorrectly or assigned the user to the wrong group.
There will still be a set standard, contractually agreed between Uni and security provider. If end users are going to make modifications, then that invalidates their contract and then neither can be held liable for any subsequent incidents. It might also affect any insurance, if that becomes a factor. You know what these companies can be like.

There’s simply no reason for student gym keys to open the dorm rooms of other students.
Even if they fire the staff for gross misconduct which is unlikely given they probably can’t even tell who issued the card its impossible to guarantee someone won’t **** up again.
I'm not arguing the faults highlighted.
But there's no guarantee your modifications will provide sufficient security against a determined intruder, either.

"Recorder McKone added: This was a disgusting and selfish thing to do. You must have know the stress this would cause.This was her first time away from home. She was left shaken over the thought you (carried out a sex act) while looking at pictures of her on the wall."
Still not assault, though, mainly because she wasn't even there during the burglary.

So not harrassment, not stalking and not a sexual offence he was just in there to steal a cup of sugar and accidently ****** over her teddy when he saw her gaming PC.
The article states he was charged with, admitted, and convicted of "burglary with intent to cause criminal damage", so that's what I'm going with.

Fitting a lock, using an alarm and going to a self defence class is a knee jerk bloodlust perspective?
Training a kid to dismember and castrate someone is pretty bloodthirsty... and given the time it takes to become sufficiently proficient to actually defend youself on any effective level, she'd graduate uni before she was even halfway there. So it'd be pretty pointless from that perspective, too.
But how many other victims of burglary in their absence suddenly decide they need to rush out and become Jean Claude Van Damme?

"if he breaks into her room again"
He deliberately waited until she was away to break in. Therefore she's not there, there is no assault, so any "kicking the **** out of him" for it, "using him for target practice" or "chopping his **** off" is not an appropriate response... and will only land her in trouble as well.

"you are entitled to use reasonable force to protect yourself"
She is miles away and not under threat. What is this highy trained commandette using force to protect herself from?
Is she a kung-fu telepath?

You mean like stalkers and rapists that offend again straight after they have been released.
5.3% according to government stats, with only 34% of those reoffending within 25 years following release.

And yes I think he could offend again and the next time the room might not be empty.
It's theoretically possible that he might try... But even if he's allowed to remain in the UK and continue at the same Uni, do you not think a convicted criminal with such a high profile would not be watched like a ******* hawk by every single other person at that Uni? He'd be more closely observed than Kim Jong-Un!

Don't forget that this is the same poster who has spent countless pages arguing that XL bullies are just "misunderstood" and the fact their attacks far outweigh any other dog is just coincidence. It seems they for some reason get a kick out of trying to use elaborate mental gymnastics to try and defend the indefensible.
Not quite my argument on that, but also irrelevant.
Again I ask what makes you think I'm defending this ****? I'm just arguing that training a kid up to be some kidn of super soldier, when they aren't even present during the offense, is a waste of time and money.

Anyway, I know if this was at my uni, I'd be making their life as miserable as possible in the hope they'd drop out (and suspect most people would be the same). It's a sad state of affairs when vigilante justice is the only recourse, but that seems to be the way things are going in the UK, and I can only see it getting worse
So you'd not be jetting off to Thailand to train for the Kumite, in case he breaks into your room (while you're not there)?
What you describe above is not vigilantism. That's just how society lets people know their behaviour is not acceptable and promotes/enforces social responsibility. It's perfectly reasonable, IMO.

I've seen this film.
Crocodile Dundee, roight?
 
Back
Top Bottom