Dis has awoken the wrath of the leftists![]()
No, he just displayed the bigotry of the right for everyone to see. :-
Not deported.
Makes a refreshing change tbh, since it's usually you.
Last edited:
Dis has awoken the wrath of the leftists![]()
Not deported.
Considering not breaking a law and becoming a criminal over here is a requirement of his visa, I think its fair to ask why he has not been deported, especially as he has no custodial sentence.When one of your very first comments is "not deported" it shows your true intensions for the thread.
You misspelled "judges who follow the law". Human rights are Human rights; they're not "only Humans who are not total *******" rights - as they were drafted by British lawyers in the aftermath of WWII, passed into international law by general agreement shortly afterwards, and embedded into British domestic law in the Human Rights Act. It's not judges who get to decide whether or not he has human rights; that is the decision of various Governments and Parliaments that have come before.
Why would anyone have an issue with him being deported anyway? He's not a British citizen. He's here on a student visa. It should be a privilege to come over here to study, not a right. And instead of making the most of that opportunity, he decides to break the law instead.
If it's "far right bigotry" to want to cancel his visa despite him being a sex pest then we are truly lost.
Fair enough. But if you can avoid extradition to most of the world by simply claiming you are gay and that you would be discriminated against in prison, then it's something that clearly needs changing.
Where do we draw the line? I'm sure gay guys get discriminated against in UK prisons too. Should we just not imprison them at all?
Dis has awoken the wrath of the leftists![]()
Considering not breaking a law and becoming a criminal over here is a requirement of his visa, I think its fair to ask why he has not been deported, especially as he has no custodial sentence.
If it's "far right bigotry" to want to cancel his visa despite him being a sex pest then we are truly lost.
It will be because, Brazil's jails are terrible and he's likely to die or be in conditions that are defined as like torture in law.Could someone explain in words of 1 syllable for me how extraditing a known criminal can cause torture, inhuman or degrading treatment, and punishment? It seems these judges are trolling surely. Did Brazil state they were going to torture him? I don't think so.
And?It will be because, Brazil's jails are terrible and he's likely to die or be in conditions that are defined as like torture in law.
But teddy bears at uni?
"I just wandered in to the wrong room, but then a saw the 5090 and was overcome with desire."Would it be better if he was in her room ******* over the 5090 in her gamimg PC?
It will be because, Brazil's jails are terrible and he's likely to die or be in conditions that are defined as like torture in law.
You don't need a country to state they will torture someone, or keep them in inhumane conditoons that make it against UK law to send people there, if it's known those are the general conditions.
It is the same reason we will not deport people to the USA if the death penalty is a likely outcome.
Well, I Googled for "female university student" and it seems they're all relatively fit...I think everyone has missed the obvious question though.
Was she fit?
Is that not what people here already do, either over their own or over the webshop pages?Would it be better if he was in her room ******* over the 5090 in her gamimg PC?
Are you speaking from experience?Lol imagine being caught....
Such an easy thing to get away with
Why do you think i had to move to Sweden?Are you speaking from experience?
The first one of that ilk that can gladly go is Lord Hermer.The judges in this country prioritise the welfare of individual criminals over the safety of its own citizens.