Disturbed dates postponed again :(

Abraham · 17 Feb 2006 at 00:44

postponing the same tour twice, now that just sucks

DISTURBED have postponed their previously announced spring 2006 European headlining tour, according to various online ticketing agencies and press reports. The trek, which was scheduled to kick off in early March (with NEVERMORE in the support slot), was reportedly called off in order to allow singer David Draiman to rest his voice after several months of intensive touring in the U.S. in support of the band's platinum-selling new CD, "Ten Thousand Fists".

Back in October 2005, DISTURBED cancelled the last seven shows of their European tour because Draiman was suffering from severe acid reflux. When he got back to Los Angeles, Draiman immediately underwent an endoscopy to make sure the surgical work that had been done in the past for his uncooperative stomach hadn't come undone, MTV.com reported last November.

DISTURBED, who are slated to stay on the road in the U.S. through February 24 in Ft. Wayne, Indiana, have rescheduled their European tour for September. It is not presently clear if NEVERMORE will still occupy the opening slot on the new dates.

Sic · 17 Feb 2006 at 08:31

it's ok. disturbed are terrible live anyway.

Abraham · 17 Feb 2006 at 09:25

they havent been any of the times i've seen them, some of the best gigs i've been to

Andybtsn · 17 Feb 2006 at 09:32

Yeah, there very good live.

Really want to see them again, along with Taproot...Been a while

Sic · 17 Feb 2006 at 09:35

i saw them at ozzfest 2000 and supporting marilyn manson and they were bloody terrible. the frontman was a complete ****

Abraham · 17 Feb 2006 at 10:46

i saw them at ozzfest 2001, and they were good
i've since seen them twice at real gigs and they were fantastic

DanSolo · 17 Feb 2006 at 11:17

Cant stand them, not particularly talented,, after all they are jsut a poor mans Pearl Jam.

Abraham · 17 Feb 2006 at 11:43

good for you, there are lots of bands i dont like, but i dont feel the need to post in threads about them saying so, I only posted this as information for the people who've bought tickets as i know there are a few from the gigs thread

DanSolo · 17 Feb 2006 at 11:54

Sure, that was evident from the original post. Im just voicing my opinion as im freely allowed to.

Big Chris · 17 Feb 2006 at 12:27

Sic said:
it's ok. disturbed are terrible live anyway.

Disturbed are terrible full stop. And yes, their front man is an idiot. Why does he feel the need to lead into songs making stupid noises?

PFG · 12 Apr 2006 at 15:15

Big Chris said:
Disturbed are terrible full stop. And yes, their front man is an idiot. Why does he feel the need to lead into songs making stupid noises?

If U have nothing constructive to say, or are just trying to get flamed in an obvious disturbed thread,just say nothing please

seeing this awesome band TWICE in october.

i too was gutted about the postponement.

PS am a disturbed ones member

Big Chris · 12 Apr 2006 at 16:46

PFG said:
If U have nothing constructive to say, or are just trying to get flamed in an obvious disturbed thread,just say nothing please...

Or, how about I'll voice my opinion anywhere I damn well like mate, cheers. And you'll note that I posted that comment nearly two months ago and you're the first one to take offence (or disagree

).

Go figure.

iCraig · 12 Apr 2006 at 16:50

Why do people drag these old threads up? Nothing better to do or something?

PFG · 12 Apr 2006 at 17:00

iCraig said:
Why do people drag these old threads up? Nothing better to do or something?

why are u trying to start a flame?

I brought this old thread up coz I alos have an opinion regarding this band and its dates/concerts

your go at a non thread related reply

iCraig · 12 Apr 2006 at 17:46

PFG said:
why are u trying to start a flame?

I brought this old thread up coz I alos have an opinion regarding this band and its dates/concerts

your go at a non thread related reply

Dude, the thread died out and people finished talking about it in February.

Opinions are fine, but it comes to a point where the thread is so old theres no need for it to be bumped back up to the top, unless there is something vital to say, such as an important update. Which your post wasn't, in the slightest.

PFG · 12 Apr 2006 at 17:50

but it did save me starting a new post

but thank i will start a new post

Abraham · 12 Apr 2006 at 18:24

Big Chris said:
Or, how about I'll voice my opinion anywhere I damn well like mate, cheers. And you'll note that I posted that comment nearly two months ago and you're the first one to take offence (or disagree ).

Go figure.

i thought it was an a-hole approach to take, but couldnt be bothered arguing it again

wooh yeah you can say whatever you want, but posting in a thread about a band you dont like, simply to say you dont like them is simply flaming

Big Chris · 12 Apr 2006 at 19:03

Abraham said:
i thought it was an a-hole approach to take, but couldnt be bothered arguing it again

wooh yeah you can say whatever you want, but posting in a thread about a band you dont like, simply to say you dont like them is simply flaming

Why is that any different to posting in a thread to say you do like them? Either way it's just a list of people saying they do or don't like something or other.

Spud21 · 12 Apr 2006 at 23:45

Sic said:
i saw them at ozzfest 2000 and supporting marilyn manson and they were bloody terrible. the frontman was a complete ****

Was that on the Holy Wood tour ? As i saw them supporting Manson at the NEC and i must concur they were a bit cack, much prefered godhead.

Sic · 12 Apr 2006 at 23:52

Spud21 said:
Was that on the Holy Wood tour ? As i saw them supporting Manson at the NEC and i must concur they were a bit cack, much prefered godhead.

haha, yeah i was at that same gig!! weird, no?