The Fintech challengers have a massive advantage as they have been able to build things from the ground up. There is a lot more risk in messing around with established and/or vendor-supplied solutions.
As mentioned before, you'd be horrified at how old some of the systems running in a lot of modern banks are now. You're talking a timeframe of several years for big migrations in many cases.
It's nice that we're seeing some of the modern features come along though. Nationwide meet my needs for my main account but I use Starling for spending which is ace.
Starling's whole bank is on a Amazon cloud system in Dublin.
The UK has already left the EUbut when the UK leaves the EU will personal banking data be allowed to be not only processed but stored off shore? Sounds like a national security risk
The UK has already left the EUI asusme you mean when the transition period ends.
You willing to pay for normal banking?
YupYou mean like most European bank customers do?
Also the Fintech banks, don't have the debt laden down by mortgages, and loans, that the traditional banks do. So all their money goes into the flashy things. Again that is slowly changing, but when they first started they couldn't provide overdrafts, as they were not able to provide loans & lending services. So they have excelled at just one function of a traditional bank.
Yup
And IIRC every time it's been suggested it happen over here there has been an outcry, not least because it typically then screws over the low income and unemployed who need bank accounts but don't usually have much to spare (IE you're expected to have a bank account for JSA to be paid into, if you're only getting ~£70 a week in JSA you can't really afford £10-20 a month for banking).
Starling's whole bank is on a Amazon cloud system in Dublin.
Pretty sure they would have built up redundancy in another zone or with another provider (again the same questions with regs).I would hope they don't and there is some "redundancy"![]()
Yup
And IIRC every time it's been suggested it happen over here there has been an outcry, not least because it typically then screws over the low income and unemployed who need bank accounts but don't usually have much to spare (IE you're expected to have a bank account for JSA to be paid into, if you're only getting ~£70 a week in JSA you can't really afford £10-20 a month for banking).
Mortgages and loans are assets from the Bank's perspective, they're certainly not "laden down" by them.
I think after the last crash where Northern Rock almost went under, and the governement has to step in and throw billions of pounds of taxpayers money to prop up some of our biggest high street banks, that that position is not entirely correct.