Do I have the worst clocking Q6600 GO ever?

Associate
Joined
17 Oct 2004
Posts
347
I am miffed, my lovely Q6600 is doing my nut.

It tops out at 380MHz FSB giving 3.4 GHz on 1.32 core volts


It refuses point blank to go any higher, additional juice isn't helping the matter at all!

What am I doing wrong here?

My 4GB of DDR2 800 on 4 x 1Gb sticks is clocking at just over 800MHz.

The temps are fine and top out at 35 deg C idle, and 48 deg C cooking on a huge Zalman copper flower jobbie.

I haven't changed anything else in the BIOS which is the stock shipping BIOS.

I'm Miffed!

Any ideas?

Ta

Andy
 
Have you tried dropping the mem multi as it might be topping the mem out with 4 sticks.
 
Nope, don't wanna fry anything. I have been looking on the net for examples of my config. and the kind of results that other people are getting. Many will go to 500MHz FSB with nothing but added core voltage!

I'm fine with it, I intended to find the maximum it would go to then run it at half way between max speed and stock for long life.

Andy
 
Yep, 380 MHz is it, no added voltage to memory or NB/SB has helped!

In fact, when I put it all back to how it was before, it didn't fancy 380 and only booted up at 375MHz!

Now I know that maximum, I'll set it to about the 320MHz zone area for now!

That'll give a nice tidy 2.9GHz on base+.8core V

On a X38 Quad GT board with a supposedly excellent clocking CPU I'm gutted!

I should have bought an off the shelf guaranteed overclocker instead!

Irritated/Miffed!


Andy
 
Have you tried dropping the CPU multiplier to see if you can push the FSB past 380mhz?
 
I have the shipping BIOS which ABit tell me is the current one.

I have run the RAM at all voltages from 1.8-2.2Volts, makes not a bit of difference!
 
mine is topping out at 380mhz fsb without tweaking too many things too, I also have 4x1gb sticks and I think its just the extra ram thats limiting it.
 
Righty ho, 400MHz FSB, memory running auto-detect voltages, CPU core standard with +.1volts offset!

All lovely on a x7 multiplier!

So, why is that working, but a 9x multi isn't!

Andy
 
To be honest, would I see any REAL WORLD application/games improvements by getting it to running faster than it is?

Am I better off having the extra bandwidth of 400MHz on a 7x multi, or faster core speed at say 350MHz on a x9 multi?

Getting a sore head from all this!

Andy
 
Back
Top Bottom