Do you agree, something massive is about to happen ?

Permabanned
Joined
18 Apr 2006
Posts
2,290
Location
14 miles from OcUK
Unjustified and unexplained military action in Afghanistan, iraq, possibly Iran

The collapse of the world economy, reports of the impending collapse of the us dollar, global recession, and rising unemployment all over the developed world

Something massive is on the horizon folks, things move in circles

The great depression of the 1930's, it started in the us and afterwards came world war 2

I reckon we are in a steady decline and we are gonna see international relations between us/uk/Israel vs Russia/china/Iran etc become even more strained to breaking point

Where will india and pakistan fit in to this mess, could they be the ones to start a large war in the middle east ?

You must agree though, that we are on the verge of something big, these are crazy times
 
Last edited:
No, just no.



Unexplained military action? Do some research, there are reasons why we are/were in Iraq and Afghanistan. And there's no military action in Iran.

what to protect us on the streets of the UK, against terrorists...
 
I really don't see this whole conspiracy; it's just people getting excited talking about tanks n' stuff. The only possibly military action I can see is Iran and it'll be Merkava's rolling in and not M1A2's. The West seems to be trying so hard to make out that it's a terrible oppresive place but from accounts of people who've been there, it's actually quite nice.

The Israelis will do the attacking, but who will be passing them the bombs, and helping them with logistics, dont you see them as puppets of Obama et al
 
In the case the case of Afghanistan, yes.

So you dont think, by the fact we are in Afghanistan, killing thousands of Muslims, with a large percentage of collateral damage, might have a negative effect on Muslims all over the world, including any disjointed and would be fundamentalists that we already have in our own country ...
 
Indeed it might have a negative effect, but all wars do. Besides, the OP said there was no reason explanation as to why we were in Afghanistan, I was merely pointing out that there is an explanation, it wasn't a random act for the laugh of it.

And you believe that is the real reason we are in Afghanistan ...

The bbc and sky, are very particular, about how they portray world events, you know ;)
 
Going into Afghanistan was a stupid, kneejerk reaction to a horrific crime against humanity orchestrated by one man who was using Afghanistan as a base of operations due to it's remoteness and the government there gladly turning a blind eye - it made sense to some people at the time, but most generally agree that getting stuck in that quagmire wasn't the smartest move.

So what do you think the "real" reason for being in Afghanistan is, oh mighty one?

This aught to be good. :rolleyes:

I believe as many others do, its so as we have another good base, to the west of Tehran to attack from

We can hit them from all sides, quickly and easily
 
Oh, should I get my news from AboveTopSecret.com instead then? Is the real reason something to do with the Illuminati, or maybe even some sand conspiracy?

I explained the real reason above

Its oil, the west needs the oil

the US economy is on its knees, they cant afford another depression like 1930

how many wars have iran started in the last 60 years ?

how many have the US started ...
 
What exactly has conspiracy and tin foil hats got to do with anything here concerning the subject of the thread, i thought we were talking about world events etc?

Seems like some on the forums like to throw those words around at anything and everything these days.

Indeed, i'm not predicting the end of the world, just that we are on the verge of a possible shift in power in the long term, and at the moment, some seriously big happenings, militarily, in the middle east
 
The OP is a very common conspiracy. That wars are already planned etc. That oil companies are controlling politics and buying out other companys. We also know why we went into Afghanistan.

There will be a slight shift in economics. But it will come back. western countries are still the best countries to develop and supply new energy technologies.

Well, 9/11. was fishy IMO, and if it was an inside job, that could lead onto all manner of possible CT being true
 
yes we have watched lose change and it's a load of rubbish. perhaps try opening your mind and reading around on the subject.

Name some grey areas so we can all have a laugh.

erm...

pentagon hole as big as a military jet, no release of footage of plane going into pentagon

wtc building 7, free fall demolition, due to a few office fires

bbc reporting above building collapse 20 mins before it did

steel in towers rated at 3000 c and fires being no hotter than 1500 c

molten metal in wreckage, weeks after collapse

the fact that it would be impossibl;e to fly a passenger jet over Manhattan and hit a skyscraper in a passenger jet even for a military pilot, let alone some Muslim dude that had supposedly had a few lessons in a Cessna

ETC ETC
 
Last edited:
Ha-Ha
1) video has been released, 2nd the hole is the right size + the sliced streetlamps on the flight path to the pentagon and a 10ton generator being clipped before impact. then you have the wreckage.

2) some office fires. Ha-HA please it got struck by huge chunks of wtc1+2 Numoures photos showing huge damage to several parts of the tower. And no it did not fall at free fall speeds. A small portion of it fell at free fall speeds. It also did not fall in a Controlled demo way. Combine that with no vidsual, sound or sismic readings for explosives.
3) hardly surprising, so much confusion and if you notice it was an overlayed image behind her, she was not there. She and other news reports also would have no idea which wtc was numbered which.

4)Steel in America is not temperature rated at all, full stop. Another conspiracy lie, that really makes them look thick.

5) molten aluminium from the plane and do you have any idea of teh energy released from such a massive building falling. You realise how much PE a building of that size holds.

6) says who. planes are relatively easy to fly.

do you have a link, as i provided one for my earlier stuff
 
I only picked a few points, i'm sure there are counter arguments debunking your reports etc

What about the supposed phone calls from 35,000 feet, mobile phones dont work above 2000 or so feet
 
How do you debunk that steel in America is not temperature tested? How do you get past that one? Why not accept you have been lied to and that you need to go do some serious research before trying to defend you position.

Phones do work, but are unreliable.

nah, theres no way the building would have collapsed like it did, with a section of weakened girders, i mean, into its own footprint, there'd be massive sections all over the place ffs, huge sections of multiple floors

squibs, explosions, people need to wake up
 
Did they manage to pilot a 767 at low altitude at 500mph? Given that it is impossible for that aircraft to go so fast as such a low altitude. (It's max speed is 568mph and at a couple of hundred feet their is significantly more air resistance on the plane, and the air is thicker and the engines just can't move it quick enough.

Also how do you explain that none of the black boxes of the 2 planes that hit the WTC have been found? Every inch of those buildings was searched for body parts and other evidence, yet not 1 of 4 boxes was found?
Although a firefighter said it was found and the FBI took it away.

YES THIS
 
Back
Top Bottom