I believe that some of those features are crippled in the uk due to legislation about the engine running when your not in the car. Could be wrong
Mine (120d March 14) only ventilates remotely (ie just turns on the fans), I did it a few times in the summer but doesn't really seem of much use.
[TW]Fox;29122592 said:The remote heat never ran the engine, bmw models with it fitted has a Webasto auxiliary heater.
If an advert says £750 dealer deposit contribution then frankly I don't care where they money comes from unless it states somewhere that I must take finance to get it, I just factor it into the price I am willing to pay for the car. If it's no longer available then take it out of the advert.
The advert it probably had something along the lines of "subject to terms and conditions"... This is where you would find the qualifying criteria... Did you look at these T&Cs before becoming butthurt about not qualifying for it?![]()
[TW]Fox;29125002 said:That's something the dealer themselves have chosen to add so I can understand your frustration![]()
[TW]Fox;29125360 said:Sounds like you've been blinded with PCP mystery science, at least now we know how they manage to shift cars at high pricesOf course increasing the GFV reduces the monthly payment but thats surely because they are moving cash between the monthly and the final payment without changing the overall value of the deal?
I'm amazed they were unable to do anything with the base price - perhaps because he'd already worked out he could get you to sign without the need to do so....
[TW]Fox;29127196 said:There is one number that matters here - 'Total amount payable'.
I was under the impression that the dealers weren't able to shift value into the GFMV as the finance house now sets this to avoid a repeat of the overvalued GFMV's back in 2007/8 which left them out of pocket.
[TW]Fox;29127196 said:Are you reducing the overall cost of the car though or just reducing the monthly cost at the expense of the final payment, meaning the overall deal value remains the same?
If the total payable is reduced, then fair enough, but you need to be careful that they don't just move the figures around to make them look more appealing whilst in reality all you are doing is obtaining a lower monthly cost, making it look cheaper, at the expense of a higher GFV - a higher GFV isn't appealing to you because it simply erodes your equity at the end of the deal.
The real value of this car won't change irrespective of what they do to the GFV - GFV's are typically set low to give you equity in the car at the end and to protect the finance house. The higher they set the GFV to reduce your monthly payment the less equity you have at the end. The car belongs to them, it's their asset not yours, hence a big GFV doesn't work in your favour as it means it costs you more to buy it at the end (or gets you less when you trade in).
Even if you never intended to pay the final payment and wanted to simply walk away you still end up worse off with a better GFV, if that makes sense..
My understanding is that there are no 'joys of PCP future value' to anyone but the salesman and finance company unless there is some sort of epic market crash a-la 2008
There is one number that matters here - 'Total amount payable'.
[TW]Fox;29127271 said:If this is the case then thats good and it must mean any reduction in the monthly payment is a reduction in the overall cost (Unless the term has increased).
Just make sure you are fully aware of what they've changed to reduce the monthly cost, thats all. Be smart![]()
I like!
Mental depreciation on these, 6 and 7 series' though.![]()