Does finding life on another planet disprove religion?
- Thread starter Valentino
- Start date
Associate
- Joined
- 13 Feb 2011
- Posts
- 263
No, it will simply prove that the Scientologists are right. 
What if the aliens don't want to be told that they were created by our god?
Indeed, what if? The acceptance, or not, of Earth-based religions by any discovered ET species (if intelligent) wouldn't disprove those religions, any more than current human scepticism does.
Associate
- Joined
- 24 Jan 2010
- Posts
- 2,141
You're right, it wouldn't have the slightest affect.
The religions would just change to adopt the new information, in the same way they've been doing for 1000's of years.
No, it will simply prove that the Scientologists are right.
Transformers didn't create earth and people.
I'm not quite sure what you mean by " spontaneously" but it's certainly theoretically possible to create primitive building blocks of life forms from existing chemical reactions without organic input under controlled conditions.
If this can be proven under laboratory conditions, where would this leave religion?
Even if man succeeds in creating elementary life (real life forms) from non-living building blocks, I don't see how this reflects on any but perhaps the most fundamentalist of religious outlook. Any such discovery should supplement and enhance religious thought, not stifle it.
I anticiapated that very reply.
On the contrary, far from enhancing the need for a god, it would undermine the requirement for a god to be needed to produce life forms and therefore undermine religious theocratic teachings!
To believe in a religion or the existance of a god, one has to reject logic and rational thinking!
Nonsense.
It means to spontaneously create something without any change from another substance.
Are you stating that we could theoretically create matter without any prior substance, effectively creating something out of nothing?
If you are then I would like to see the citation.....
Associate
- Joined
- 31 Aug 2009
- Posts
- 1,015
- Location
- Surrey, UK
If you show that you something can be created out of nothing, it still doesn't answer the more intriging 'why' question. Why anything, really. The goal posts will always shift when you are attempting to address ultimately unanswerable questions.
The sooner everyone learns to respect everyone's beliefs the better.
The sooner everyone learns to respect everyone's beliefs the better.
None of those actually state that you can create something from absolute nothing however...
The issue with creation of something from nothing is that we can only operate within the Universe itself, and because of that we can never truly create something from absolute nothing, there is always a mechanism or a starting point or some form of energy that is the catalyst for change, even with the big bang it was something before it became the expanding universe be it a singularity or something else we have yet to explain.
Because of this, even if as a species we are successful in creating another species or even an entire world, there will always be the question of God. Whether you believe the universe and everything in it spontaneously came into being or whether it was set into being by a creator or whether the very Universe itself is God is a philosophical and not a scientific question.
Science really is not equipped to answer philosophical questions and equally the converse is also true.
Last edited:
That's rather dismissive without any qualification of your answer!
Perhaps you will be so good as to provide evidence of the existance of any god that has existed or actually exists.
A religion will adapt to incorporate new ideas in order to reaffirm it's stance as being 'correct', obviously the idea that God created man, for the Christians, will have to change in some manner. As the Bible seems to portray man as some sort of 'special' creation which would make other species essentially lesser - which is something that would be likely to cause some sort of friction, especially if their religion, if they have one, states that they have some special place.
It's impossible to say just exactly how religion will react other than it will change. That unfortunately is why I dislike religion. It pushes forth such certainty and yet, under threat, is quite willing to abandon it's fundemental ideas in order to survive. I suppose it could be considered an admirable trait if it weren't so dangerous.
It's impossible to say just exactly how religion will react other than it will change. That unfortunately is why I dislike religion. It pushes forth such certainty and yet, under threat, is quite willing to abandon it's fundemental ideas in order to survive. I suppose it could be considered an admirable trait if it weren't so dangerous.
Indeed.
Human Nature being what it is however, I doubt that time will come soon, if at all.
Yes it will disprove them, but....
One of my mates is a religious nutjob. He believes anything which is not in the Quran is false and just does not exist. He believes dinosaurs (fossils) are a figment of the American government (read "Illuminati"), created solely for the purpose of disproving Islam.
So even if they find E.T. life, the religious nutjobs with just think it's a conspiracy against them.
Last edited:
Indeed. To state that one has to reject logic and rational thinking to adhere to a religion or believe in a god is a strange assertion.
To be honest, I wouldn't be entirely surprised should science and religion/philosophy one day merge into some kind of super-discipline. Put another way, I think that it's entirely possible that one day we'll be able to measure the things that currently aren't measurable.
While hardly mainstream, an engineer named Ronald Pearson has some interesting maths demonstrating (he says) that one can amalgamate quantum and relativistic theory to explain the origins of the universe, that God IS the universe, and that we are all simply eternal fractions of this universal God-consciousness explainable by today's physics and basic mathematics.
While I'm certainly not advocating that he's right, it certainly does get the imagination running.