Drum Triggers.

Seems reasonable to me. As I mentioned above, I think that if you can pipe the mic's from the drums into the mac there's no reason why you couldn't apply some funky effects to the real drums which may give you better results than triggering a sampled sound.

I would do that but the way things are if the triggers failed, id still have the kit mic'd up, so there would still be drum sounds through the PA. if i put microphones through the Mac, and it failed during performance id be shagged.
 
The drummer for us has a similar setup to what your doing (albeit a little less complicated) and we have managed to get it working for a live performances.

He has a mid range TD8 electronic kit with MIDI I/O out the rear panel of the roland module. We use an EMU 1x1 USB-MIDI converter (£20) into a dell laptop (dual core 1.6Ghz, 2GB RAM, 120GB) and Cubase in this case. Load up a MIDI track and your selected piece of software. At the moment we are using BFD2 (55GB libary) and also Superior 2.0 (the sucessor to EZ Drummer) which are the best sampled drums available.

We then monitor the track so it comes out of the main outs of the soundcard and then into two active DI's (little soundcard has unbalanced outputs), which then converts the two signals into XLR's that are fed into the multicore, which then goes to two channels on the desk. Pan them hard left, hard right and then just feed them through the PA.

To get no feel of latency, we have to use 96Khz sample rate, 128 buffer size
which gives around 3.5ms overall, but obviously uses quite a bit of CPU power. However, as this type of software is all sample based loading, it eats away at your RAM but doesnt drain the CPU of too much power. At the most, the CPU usage was at 65% with the drummer going at it at his best, so basically as long as its a half decent dual core, it'll be fine with a low buffer size. Also, 1GB of RAM is enough for EZ Drummer, but not for superior 2.0 or BFD2. Most occassions we have seen it peak over the 1.5GB size with a moderate size kit, although we do load up most of the kits anyway so that if we wish to change a trigger pad to hit something else, we don't have to wait for it to load up the samples for that kit (ie. Cowbell can be used on one of the toms if you wish)

Others may take a look at this video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0jXntCofC9k

And watch this video about the new Superior 2.0. http://www.toontrack.com/videos/Namm_2008_S2.0_Demo_640x480.html.

And believe me, these new pieces of software sound amazing. A million times better than those found on the Roland module.

And Neoni is correct about most other professional drummers using triggers. He went to see Genesis a few months ago and they used them then. :)
 
Its Great.

You wouldnt like the zilbel at all!

I went to see a band last night doing Metallica, Megadeth etc and the drummer had an 8" and 6" splash and continuosly used them all night :(
They just don't sound right.
At the end of the gig the band asked for my comments and I had to tell the drummer to leave them at home.
They have no place on a rock drumkit and they remind me of those electronic drums we had in the late 70s that went - poo pooooooooo poo pooooooooooo.
 
Again dmp - if an 8" splash is good enough for Ian Paice, it's good enough for any rock kit ;)
 
Again dmp - if an 8" splash is good enough for Ian Paice, it's good enough for any rock kit ;)

Goes to dig out his 1972 Live In Denmark to see how much he uses it :)

BTW, it was that concert that finally settled the age old argument of did he/didn't he use double bass drums on Fireball.
On that concert the roadies bring on another bass drum for the encore and he kicks into Fireball.
I then learnt that he borrowed keith Moons kit when they recorded it in the studio.
 
I'm surprised Keith Moon actually had a permanant kit, I thought he destroyed each kit after about an hours use! :p
 
Back
Top Bottom