Ebola scaremongering?

Further to the usual 'bodily' fluids advice, this brief Q&A seems to answer more realistic questions posed by the public. Taken from the Guardian web site.
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/oct/13/how-avoid-catching-ebola

Could I get Ebola from using gym equipment?
No. Nobody who had Ebola and was symptomatic, with intense muscle weakness and a fever in the early stages, would be well enough to go to the gym – and until they are symptomatic, they are not infectious. Sweat, anyway, is probably not a source of large amounts of virus – in fact, the World Health Organisation (WHO) says whole live virus has never been isolated from sweat.

How about saliva?
WHO says saliva at the most severe stage of the disease, and also tears, may carry some risk, but the studies are inconclusive. The virus has been detected in breast milk. A 2007 study in the Journal of Infectious Diseases is probably the most informative on where the virus hides.

Can I get Ebola from a toilet seat?
Yes – faeces from somebody with Ebola are a real hazard and the virus has also been detected in urine. But there would only be a danger if a seriously sick person had used the toilet and contaminated it and that is most likely in their home or hospital. Public toilets, in general, are very unlikely to be a risk.

Can it be sexually transmitted?
Yes, and the virus lasts in the semen of people who have recovered, maybe for as long as 90 days.

Could I catch Ebola from using a taxi that has taken a patient to hospital?
The virus can be transmitted on surfaces that bodily fluids have touched, so if somebody had bled or vomited on the seat, there would be a risk to anybody who had a cut or touched their face with contaminated hands. In Europe or the US, if a patient was diagnosed with Ebola, there would be a massive effort from the public health authorities to trace their movements as well as their contacts. Any taxi they had travelled in while sick would have to be decontaminated.

Could I catch Ebola from door handles a patient had touched?
Yes, if the handle was contaminated with blood, vomit or faeces, which would be more likely in the house where the patient had been living when they fell sick, or in the hospital. But if people have intact skin, do not touch their eyes, nose or mouth and frequently wash their hands, they will not get infected.
 
Not quite sure why this nurse is complaining. Surely it's common sense to be put in quarantine until 100 sure she is not infected.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-29775698

Does this mean the 700ish British medical troops that flew over earlier this month will also be quarantined on their return?



They weren't medical troops most were engineers and the crew of a ship
 
I'm aware of that but it makes sense to quarantine our British medical teams when they return.

It will make perfect sense, just keep them in camp for 3 weeks R&R, then home.

Only reason not so, is if there is 100% certainty they encountered zero Ebola sufferers and zero risk of contact with Ebola materials.
Unsure how you could determine this to be 100%.
 
I'm heading back to Madrid for the first time in three weeks, I think it's safe to do so now!
 
Back
Top Bottom