Efficiency of vans?

Trucks (i.e. a six axle artic running at full weight 44t) will average around 8-9mpg over mainly motorway/dual carriageway driving.

This figure will rise into the low teens if pulling a low weight, equally, running at full weight in stop start city traffic will get you down to 2-3mpg average.
A couple of examples,
Not much difference in average speed but a large variation in MPG - both 13litre Scania trucks.
DSC00039.jpg


DSC00311.jpg
 
Last edited:
That's quite impressive really, I'd assumed it would be closer to half that.

It is impressive when you think it is a 13 litre engine pulling 44tonnes.
some cars weighing in at 2 tonnes only managed figures about 3 times that taking it steady on a run.
 
Used to get 25-30 when running Transits with the old Banana lump in them, 35-40 seems pretty good to me.
 
The main reason they use less fuel I guess (im not sure what rpm they do at motorway speed) is engine speed,
I have a dodge ram 6.7 turbo derv, I tow a 5th wheel caravan from time to time (18tonnes ish inc the truck) and at 60ish shes doing 900rpm in 10th, whereas a regular diesel car will be 2k-2.5k dependent on gearing.
 
The main reason they use less fuel I guess (im not sure what rpm they do at motorway speed) is engine speed,
I have a dodge ram 6.7 turbo derv, I tow a 5th wheel caravan from time to time (18tonnes ish inc the truck) and at 60ish shes doing 900rpm in 10th, whereas a regular diesel car will be 2k-2.5k dependent on gearing.

9vURr0Z.jpg


Like that?

not bad... not bad at all...
 
The main reason they use less fuel I guess (im not sure what rpm they do at motorway speed) is engine speed,
I have a dodge ram 6.7 turbo derv, I tow a 5th wheel caravan from time to time (18tonnes ish inc the truck) and at 60ish shes doing 900rpm in 10th, whereas a regular diesel car will be 2k-2.5k dependent on gearing.

At 55MPH (it's limited speed) my Scania is doing roughly 1250RPM in 12th gear, regardless of weight i.e. loaded or empty it's the same.
Obviously fully freighted you have to drop 11th or 10th on motorway hills, not empty though.
 
Mercedes 313cdi bluemotion - 22mpg round town is my daily average currently! Quite a way of quoted figures, maybe it will loosen up as it only has 3k miles on it.
 
Looking at any car comparison website or the manufactures sites, it's easy to see the mpg of cars and compare them. The same data doesn't seem as easy to find for vans.

The T5 is available with five different 2.0 TDI engines ranging from 84 to 180PS, with 5, 6 or 7 speed boxes, with or without 4-wheel drive and in SWB or LWB. Loads of numbers on the websites but no mpg figures!

Surely from a commercial point of view this is useful information - why isn't it provided? What kind of efficiency does a 2800 kg 2.0TDI 140PS SWB T5 return? That same engine in a 1500 kg Golf will return 70mpg on a run - what would the T5 return?
Weight is largely irrelevant on a motorway. Aerodynamics are what matter.
 
That is very impressive for the lorries tbh, I expected far less than that.

Truck manufacturers go to a great deal of effort to ensure that their engines are as efficient as possible. Trucks use so much fuel over their lifetime that it is worth spending a great deal of money on squeezing every last fraction of an MPG out of them. (Far more so than with smaller vehicles and private cars! Which IMO are well past point of diminishing returns by now)

However, the efficiency is only achieved over a very narrow power/load band (Hence the 12 gears!) They can achieve remarkable efficiency at constant speed at their design load but it drops off quickly once conditions move away from this eg stop/start or even slowing down and speeding up!
 
On an HGV I'd have thought rolling resistance would be pretty significant?

Yeah sorry, I was talking about comparing a 1500kg Golf to a '2800kg' Van.

Apparently RR on a truck is responsible for 1/3rd of fuel consumption, a max speed of 56mph will limit the aero impact too
 
Back
Top Bottom