Employers Genius solution to staff retention issues.

What's your current notice period if they make you redundant? I'd make sure the notice you have to give and the notice they have to give are the same.

As Dis86 says, 3 month notice period isn't totally unusual, but is more common in more specialist jobs. I have a 3 month notice period, but on the flip side they also have to give me 3 months notice for redundancy :).
 
What's your current notice period if they make you redundant? I'd make sure the notice you have to give and the notice they have to give are the same.

As Dis86 says, 3 month notice period isn't totally unusual, but is more common in more specialist jobs. I have a 3 month notice period, but on the flip side they also have to give me 3 months notice for redundancy :).

They only have to give me 5 weeks notice as the 12 weeks is not reciprocated in my favour, only benefits them.

I have emailed them (HR) today and will back it up with a written letter.

This what I have sent:

FAO HR Manager.

I am writing to you in response to the letter I received on the 4th February 2016 on the reference stated above. With regard to your request for me to agree to a unilateral change in my contract of employment with XXXXX, I formally decline to agree and you are to take this letter as my formal objection to this unilateral change.

I also request to raise a formal grievance with XXXXX over this change which I do not agree too. Can you please inform me on how to raise that formal grievance through XXXXX documented process.

I’d like to take this opportunity to state my extreme disappointment in how this matter has been dealt with in what I see as an unprofessional manner by XXXXX. It is clear that this decision has already been made without any due consideration for the me as an employee.

I have not received any written proposal to the contract changes that XXXXX are implementing on 1st March 2016 and therefore there has not been a reasonable time frame or the formal opportunity to consult over this matter, which I would expect to be at least one month from receipt of the proposals.

Please find attached some bullet points detailing further my objections to this unilateral change in my contract of employment.

Effect for Employer

· Helps Prevent high staff turnover which begs the question why does XXXXX have a high staff turnover and poor staff retention?

· Conveniently shackles employee to current place of employment and account.

· Easy solution without addressing the real reasons for people leaving, difficulties in recruiting and poor staff retention.

· There is every appearance of this being a formal agreement in which only one group of people involved agrees to do something (i.e. a unilateral contract).



Effect for Employee



· De-motivates staff as it’s seen as a restrictive action upon employees.

· Contractual change has no tangible benefit whatsoever for the employee.

· Notice period is not reciprocated by XXXXX to the employee.

· Removes an employee’s ability to be mobile in the work force if seeking career progression with a future employer. Three months’ notice will invariably be unacceptable for a future employer. Contrary to what we have been told three months is NOT an industry standard and certainly not for front line technical IT staff.

· This action has had an immediate negative effect on morale and needs to be recognised by XXXXX management. It is not a good policy for staff retention and has only increased the desire to ‘move on’ amongst individuals and has thus not proved to be a satisfactory solution.

· It leaves XXXXX staff open to further contractual, benefit and pay restrictions knowing that the ability of staff to further their career elsewhere has been made harder.

· Concern was shown that staff were notified in separate groups and not as a whole.

· If staff recruitment is an issue then XXXXX should be looking at more incentives to stay. A three month notice period on a new contract is very unattractive let alone the change to an existing one.

· It is understandable that a company wants to keep a motivated work force but this should not be at the expense of individuals managing their own career prospects.

Regards,

:D
 
That just reeks of incompetence and arrogance from your employer,

"we poorly run a company and nobody is happy, so rather than try and figure out our failings as a company, we'll tell staff they cannot leave, its their problem they hate us, not ours"
 
I'll say it again, get your CV out there OP - update your linkedin, start talking to recruiters now...

Definitely this. The whole thing is just a passive-aggressive move by your employer because they don't have the time, inclination or money to fix what are obviously people management issues. Nothing they can put in a new contract will fix that.
 
That is a real terrible move by a company that is clearly desperate.

The only reason a company will struggle to retain its employees is if a) they're underpaid compared to other roles on the market, b) they're completely taken for granted, c) employees don't get on with management - which kinda comes on the back of b.

There are much better ways to retain employees.

When i started my current role, i was offered RSUs (virtual shares) as part of the compensation. I'm allowed to vest 1/3rd of the RSU's each year, upto 3 years.
 
I used to work for an appalling large UK based employer, I then moved to a hopeless 'keep all bad news a secret' smaller company and have recently moved to a large UK based company that treats people well. I am now significantly happier with life.

OP: The company you are at clearly is not giving people enough money, treating them well enough, training them well enough, or letting them progress. Perhaps they are just bored or are fed up with moving goalposts or false promises.

Your best move is to politely decline the new contract and put some serious effort into finding a new job.
 
Keep us posted on their response.

My old employer was going to implement the same thing (three months notice for employees, 1 month for employer) but I got out before they could change everyone's contracts.
 
There are much better ways to retain employees.

When i started my current role, i was offered RSUs (virtual shares) as part of the compensation. I'm allowed to vest 1/3rd of the RSU's each year, upto 3 years.

is it a public company? If not - are there any buyback provisions for these if you were to leave?
 
No they won't.

I've had that period for my last 3 jobs. Though what I do is fairly specialist so they need that length of time to find a replacement. It's fairly standard though.

You can't compare your role that you have just admitted is fairly specialist, to a desktop support position. People recruiting IT support aren't going to wait three months for people to become available.
 
You can't compare your role that you have just admitted is fairly specialist, to a desktop support position. People recruiting IT support aren't going to wait three months for people to become available.

Which would largely be the litmus test if it ever came to court.
 
Most employers wont let you continue working once you've given notice of resignation anyway

Not in my experience. I think (ignoring pre-booked holiday) I worked 8 weeks of my 9 week notice period last time I left a company. I expect it depends a lot on the type of job and what information you have access to.
 
Seems they can provided they give you your current notice as notice to the change, but refusing to accept the new terms and them refusing to offer you he same contract could mean they are lliable for unfair dismissal....

Indeed - I would seek immediate legal advice.

They have changed the conditions of contract - although they usually have some "we can change anything" type of clause.. it means that if you cannot accept the change and they are effectively making your position untenable then it could be that you are being forced out of employment without anything you have done.

My contract terms changed from 3 months to 1 month with an acquisition, at the time the position was a take it or leave it - i.e. your position in the old company would disappear making the position redundant. Unsure if that's legal but everyone just switched over.. then later (over a year) I was made redundant with 1 month notice period and basic package etc.

So the fact they're making it hard for everyone makes me think that they're attempting to simply make it easier to get rid of people.. it's not the action of a company that's attempting to hold on to people unless they're loosing people because they refuse the longer notice period - and that can be done per-person anyway for new recruits..
 
Back
Top Bottom