Energy Prices (Strictly NO referrals!)

Those unit rates are pretty high now, going to hit the poorest hard I reckon.

Gas is fixed for a year at 5.8p and charging battery on GO so it wont affect me much.
 
Last edited:
I think we're approaching the tipping point for people on fixed incomes.

Labour is a disaster so far. It's done nothing what it said it was going to in this area.

The bean counters are only interested in numbers on a balance sheet. They don't care about the people and the real world consequences of price rises.


Starmer is a liar. I remember watching a parliamentary committee about GB Energy with the guy in charge. When asked how he's going to cut bills he said he didn't know. That wasn't how GB Energy was setup.
 
Gb energy is just going to invest in renewables. Its only investing a pathetic £8billion over the entire parliament. Its not going to do anything to lower prices. When did he say it would reduce bills by £500?
 
Yet again ofgem aiding and abetting and nothing done by the government. No doubt news headlines of record profits soon to follow...

Its unfair to say such a thing, the government are doing plenty, what they are doing is causing energy to go up.

Don't ask the government to do anything, ask instead that they ***** off.
 
I think I'm going to hop off the Octopus tracker for now and take the 16M fixed. Last month's bill averaged out a hair cheaper than the fixed. This month, though, tracker has been a bit worse than the current fixed. Like others, I'm wary of the price rise in April.

Considering there's no exit fees, I don't really see much downside.
I need to look at mine also. I'm on the old tracker rates which finish in a few days - I imagine it will be close these days.
 
Last edited:
Moved over from Octopus tracker to 16m fixed yesterday.

It was a no brainer. 6.4% rise. Robbing ********
 
Hope Trump fixes this Ukraine issue so the energy prices go back down :lol:

Just had an email from Octopus, I'm still on Flexible Octopus, but its telling me that the estimates between that and switching to Loyal Octopus 16 Month is the same...


Octopus are a bunch of crybabies
 
This is a pretty simple explanation that only takes a couple of minutes to read.


You have to bear in mind that most people are on fixed or standard billing so the energy cos have to make assumptions on pricing.
If you move to a TOU (tiem of use) tariff such as octopus agile you will see lower bills generally as its tied to the half hourly pricing.
Or a daily priced one such as Octopus Tracker that is same price for the whole day, but varies by day.
Both the above though come with a risk of high or very high unit costs should there be low wind, low solar and high demand. (Such as overcast, still, cold winter days)
Especially for the peaks (morning breakfast and the biggest peak, evening meal time)

In many free markets all generators are paid the price that the most recent generation that came on is paid, so if renewable can't fill peak demand they have to turn on gas or coal then the renewable gets paid the same. It's kinda stupid but if they didn't then they'd be picking winners and losers. Adding more renewable generation makes supply more peaky and less stable (because solar doesn't generate at night, the wind doesn't always blow and batteries are too expensive), leading to higher peak prices and therefore your cost becomes more tied to generation that can be turned on quickly at peak times, like gas

The only way to overcome this volatility in prices is to overbuild baseload, build a few massive hydro dams. But you'll never get private investors to go for this, because it will lower the ROI for all generators, only the government can get a project like this off the ground

Free markets in electricity tend to all be heading in the same direction - power prices going up because when your generation is built solely based on the return on investment, the only generation that will get built is the type that is most expensive and gets the best prices (higher) for investors and not customers
 
Last edited:
I’d love to know where you think we can build some massive hydro dams in the U.K.

If we had the opportunity for a meaningful amount of hydro, we would have build it already…..
 
I’d love to know where you think we can build some massive hydro dams in the U.K.

If we had the opportunity for a meaningful amount of hydro, we would have build it already…..

It's just an example of baseload, there are others - such as nuclear, geothermal etc
 
Last edited:
The entire system we are pursuing doesnt work. It could work with the gas generators owned and run by the government but they wont do that for ideological reasons. The current plan is literally baking in expensive energy and as we add more renewables the price gas plants need to charge to be profitable becomes more and more expensive.
 
Last edited:
Severn estuary, Humber estuary.
Those are not hydro plants, they would be tidal plants which are ultimately untested and experimental which was the reason those plans were canned originally.

I’m not saying they are a bad idea, just very risky in that they may not work.
 
It's just an example of baseload, there are others - such as nuclear, geothermal etc
I’d also love to know where you think we can build geothermal in the U.K.

Nuclear costs £megaLOL and always has, not just now but also for tens of thousands of years while the waste deteriorates to the point it becomes harmless. Oh yes the power station and the waste has to be protected by armed guards because it’s a gigantic security risk.

As @200sols points out though, the current market economics doesn’t work and is going to make less and less sense moving forward. Gas power stations are running for less time, and that means the capital deployed needs to be recovered from less energy produced so it gets more and more expensive the less it runs.

That said, all the wind farms (and Nuclear stations) that have been built recently and all those under construction operate on a strike price, if the wholesale price moves above the strike price, the wind farm pays back the difference so they don’t benefit from the peak pricing. However it does me we don’t benefit so much if it’s extremely windy and the price goes through the floor.
 
Last edited:
Those are not hydro plants, they would be tidal plants which are ultimately untested and experimental which was the reason those plans were canned originally.

I’m not saying they are a bad idea, just very risky in that they may not work.

The Thames could be used as a test bed as there is already the barrier.

As raising sea levels continue more tidal barriers will be required - they should be built to harness tidal.
 
The Thames could be used as a test bed as there is already the barrier.

As raising sea levels continue more tidal barriers will be required - they should be built to harness tidal.


Is that a serious comment? The Themes tidal barrier and the proposed tidal lagoon near Swansea are literally are nothing alike.

The only similarity is literally (by its correct definition) the word tidal in the name.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom