England vs The Netherlands & other International Friendlies ** spoilers ** [29th Feb 2012]

Yeah just to make sure you were the age I thought you were

yeh. you do realise i could've put any age in there?

i noticed there was a calender on the forum the other day, clicked on it and was amaaaazed at the number of forum users with a birthday on 1st january, then i cottoned on!

i am 32 though, for the record though i could pass for 27.
 
yeh. you do realise i could've put any age in there?

i noticed there was a calender on the forum the other day, clicked on it and was amaaaazed at the number of forum users with a birthday on 1st january, then i cottoned on!

i am 32 though, for the record though i could pass for 27.

Probably get away with 12.

(joke before im banned)
 
He was playing the entire match, you just didn't notice him while he was **** for the first 60 minutes as per usual.

Really I swear I was seeing him come on at 83 minutes or something. Probably knackered so XD
 
Me having the audacity to ask someone that question because he thinks my posts are retarded :p

I do :p but I was just in amazement at the reply haha

However, It's a little more of a shock that someone in that age group can still fail to grasp or understand very simple idea's or theories.

The less I say the better :)
 
I do :p but I was just in amazement at the reply haha

However, It's a little more of a shock that someone in that age group can still fail to grasp or understand very simple idea's or theories.

The less I say the better :)

Not sure if talking about me :p

In summary though of last night though, England are still rubbish and won't win anything.
 
Except the agreement of thinking my posts are retarded :p

oh yeah :p

I was more in amazement that someone of cm's age fails to understand or grasp certain very simple idea's, among other things.

Anyway, less said the better as this has nothing to do with football.
 
Any one else find it absolutely ludicrous that Pearce's explanation for omitting Oxlade-Chamberlain from the squad was thus:

Stuart Pearce said:
He's played only a handful of games

...yet he picked Campbell and Cleverley in the squad? Stats for the season below:

Oxlade-Chamberlain: 16 club appearances of which 12 were starts
Campbell: 6 club appearances of which 3 were starts
Cleverley: 9 club appearances of which 8 were starts

So Ox has more appearances and starts than BOTH players COMBINED yet the reason for leaving him out was due to lack of games? How on earth could he justify picking players who were still in single figures for apperances this season then?

I know I've been in favour of Pearce but it is a bit concerning if he is so out of touch with how our young English players are doing, especially considering his background as U21 manager.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom