epic engine death!

Oh yeah, because your Golf interior is a mountain of quality! ;)

I'd say your Golf has more hard plastics inside than a Rover.
 
Last edited:
Talk about the pot calling the kettle black. You drive the most plasticy, slowest and what's probably regarded as the worst Golf ever made with a tiny engine and you're taking the mick out of turbo'd Rovers. I can tell you now that your Golf has probably one of the worst interiors I've ever seen in a VW.
 
Everyone that's been in the Ti has been impressed with the interior quality, it is far superior to my old Fiesta and also better than both of my 400s.

The 620ti is far from budget motoring, comfy, lots of toys and plenty of power. :)

Edit: just saw Golf, and lol. Designed by Fisher Price, and powered by Flymo. Have fun ;)
 
Last edited:
My excuse is my new found love for big comfy cars, that also have some muscle. I was prepared to put up with bits of trim falling off, but it is built much better than expected, also the cabin is a nice place to be.

I fail to see the problem?
 
and the one we're currently rebuilding should be around 350bhp when it's done, who cares what the dashboard looks like. stop trolling my thread.
 
Janesy B said:
Agw's has 250bhp and goes like poo off a shovel and rover416's 620TI has 200bhp and probably cost less than your Golf.
Click to expand...

My golf cost £350, it's cheap to run and reliable.

And also it's not just the plasticy interior, it's the ugly exterior, you can tell they were made in birmingham if you know what i mean.
I'd rather buy a shed for a few hundred and save my money for something nice to modify.

Maybe it's an old man thing or something.
 
and this cost £300 *shrug*

n504074146_1935548_5935347.jpg
 
agw_01 said:
My car isn't THAT fast, it doesn't handle THAT well and it's not very comfortable... but my god, it's fun :D
Click to expand...

Nope, it only annihilates most things it shouldn't including BMW 330's in a straight line.


Part from that it's a shed :p
 
I get around said:
Should've gone to specsavers if you think they're good looking cars, christ, if rovers were girls they'd be beyond double baggers.
Click to expand...

You sure you're 18?

Either way given you've never driven one judging by the amazing golf you have.... I don't think your opinion counts. Your posting behaviour is rather troll like too
 
Should've gone to specsavers if you think they're good looking cars, christ, if rovers were girls they'd be beyond double baggers.
Click to expand...

I think the 220's look really nice.

Then again, I own a Scorpio Cosworth and a Westfield (both regarded as ugly cars by the majority of the motoring public), so my opionion isn't worth a pinch of salt :-)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom