Tefal from past conversations I can say beyond a shadow of a doubt that your history of drug use is far more extensive than mine, so you can quit the trolling.
I have always maintained a consistent position that drug controls should be removed aside from a few special cases such as antibiotics and antivirals because of the numerous socioeconomic benefits, so no I haven't changed stance in response to you. The best you can come up with is an anecdote about your experiences on the gay scene and to paraphrase, "any sane person could see it would be a massive disaster". Not very convincing to me honestly, to use your example of benzodiazepines which you seem to love bringing up so much, they actually were legal until the legal high bans came into effect, without the so called disaster scenario occurring. I make no assertions that people would use all drugs legitimately (whatever that means), that is not a factor in my argument.
Anyway this is largely irrelevant to the topic of this thread, this is a case where the economic advantages of not requiring a prescription for medications would be more evident.
