Everyone must read

[Stelly]

tbh

why, why would you post that for? thats really annoying

Stelly

 

[allllec]

lol im sorry

 

[semi-pro waster]

lol im sorry

is this ok

http://homepage.ntlworld.com/frances.hewitt1/roll.png[img][/QUOTE]

Rate the thread anything you want but why just throw a rolleyes smiley in as your only contribution to the thread? It doesn't tell anyone why you think the thread(or an individual post) worthy of derision because you haven't directed it at anything. If you explained a bit more then maybe use the rolleyes smiley it might have made more sense.

 

[PikKOn]

back in the day you could change both the FSB and the mulitplyer, so if your ram/chip couldn't take a higher FSB you could inc the multi by 1 and drop the FPB down BUT STILL HAVE A FASTER CHIP! and this was good.
then intel started locking the multiplyers on their chips so you couldn't (as did AMD on some chips, but easy to get around at the time iirc).

its just another way of getting more speed, or the maximum speed, from one chip.
but this report is leaving out the real world results of running those chips at that speed. the 6600 and above because they have larger cash will outperform a 6300 etc even with a lower clock speed.

Cheers Vent for clearing that up

 

[Psycho Sonny]

Rate the thread anything you want but why just throw a rolleyes smiley in as your only contribution to the thread? It doesn't tell anyone why you think the thread(or an individual post) worthy of derision because you haven't directed it at anything. If you explained a bit more then maybe use the rolleyes smiley it might have made more sense.

i think hes trying to get more posts so he can see members market

on another note if asus just made it up then surely they can be done for that? i was just trying to let people know just in case they had missed it, so if the cache only makes a 400mhz difference then the e6300 owns all the other conroes when overclocked since they overclock further