Excuses, excuses......

so you basically have no idea. for all you know it could barely be making any positive boost at all, without an intercooler it maybe retarding so much that the 'gain' is negligable, the guy hardly came across as knowledgable (his mods are listed as 'stage 1' ffs)

the M3 was poorly driven, i think if they were lined up again etc with competant drivers, the M3 would not embarass itself as badly as in the vid.

the M3 driver hardly did himself any favours by throwing his toys out the pram either lol
 
Matt82 said:
so you basically have no idea. for all you know it could barely be making any positive boost at all, without an intercooler it maybe retarding so much that the 'gain' is negligable, the guy hardly came across as knowledgable (his mods are listed as 'stage 1' ffs)

the M3 was poorly driven, i think if they were lined up again etc with competant drivers, the M3 would not embarass itself as badly as in the vid.

the M3 driver hardly did himself any favours by throwing his toys out the pram either lol
Click to expand...

So you have basically no idea, for all you know that Honda could be making some serious power which was why it beat the M3.
 
can you read? have you seen the video?

i have already said, in the video you can see the M3 is held on the limiter for upto a second at a time between gear changes.

hence i know the M3 was not driven to its full potential, hence i questioned if the honda was that fast at all.

you should read the thread first ;)
 
What car was what when they were racing? the BMW wasnt the one with the camra in it was it :eek:
They went past too fast for my tired eyes to see.
 
Matt82 said:
can you read? have you seen the video?

i have already said, in the video you can see the M3 is held on the limiter for upto a second at a time between gear changes.

hence i know the M3 was not driven to its full potential, hence i questioned if the honda was that fast at all.

you should read the thread first ;)
Click to expand...


He ran twice and got beaten twice, who cares what was said in the thread. It was you insinuating stuff about the Honda although none of us knows anything about it bar it won on both runs ;)
 
you were commenting on views expressed in the thread, therefore the contents of the thread would be important lol

the BMW did get convincingly battered, no one can deny that.
 
Matt82 said:
so what do you know that i dont?
Click to expand...

A turbo'd RSX will make an absolute minimum of 280bhp. Most likely 300.

Weight is 1170 kilos too, which is a fair bit lighter than an M3.
 
merlin said:
A turbo'd RSX will make an absolute minimum of 280bhp. Most likely 300.

Weight is 1170 kilos too, which is a fair bit lighter than an M3.
Click to expand...


prove it ;)

im not that up on RSXs, are they all k20?
 
Matt82 said:
you were commenting on views expressed in the thread, therefore the contents of the thread would be important lol

the BMW did get convincingly battered, no one can deny that.
Click to expand...

I commented on the view of your one post if Im not mistaken, not views in the thread which was why I wrote who cares what was said in the thread ;)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom