Failing Routers causing problems

Associate
Joined
21 Apr 2010
Posts
250
Ive a Asus RT-N56U router and when i first bought it i could use my phone in the garden. But after a couple of years and upgrading the virgin to its top speed.. ive nitice its struggling to keep up with the amount of things connected to it. Mobiles, tablets, printer. the wifi singnal is really poor now. and with the kids getting older i think its about time to upgrade to another asus one. (just personal preferance for asus) And recomendations please.
 
It could be worth splitting out into 2 routers, main router and an additional as a access point to try and share the load. If you have a lot of devices and they are all pushing the wifi it would make sense. You may be able to use your trusty n56 as the access point and put a replacement main router in, something like an ac56?

The asus rs are in general really good CES of kit if you want an off the shelf buy, configure and forget set up.
 
Not sure if its the router because ive tryed trying my phone in the garden when everyone was out. Doesnt happen very often. and it was still poor. Also i didnt put that theirs three gaming consoles and two pc conneted to the unit. would it be a god idea to have the virgin one used. (Diconnected at the moment as i used the asus.?
Would this one do the trick as my one doesnt have external antenna

My basket at Overclockers UK:

Total: £217.69
(includes shipping: £8.70)



 
Wifi signal doesn't degrade over time as such, environments change over time, check you're on one of the non overlapping chan's and it's not massively congested from all your neighbours using it as well. As to improving range, I really rate the Ubiquiti kit, it works well and isn't expensive.
 
dont want to gate crash the thread but how do these work??? wondering if too many devices connected at once is what my problem has been

The same way any AP does - you plug it in via RJ45 and in the case of the Ubiquiti kit use a PoE injector to power it. Being a separate device you normally run a cable to a central location and it can easily cover a conventional home, if you need more then you can add a pair - for example someone on here had thick stone walls and needed one either side to achieve full coverage. It gives your wifi independence from your router, single devices are cute and everything, but they're rarely the best at the job, especially as you're needs evolve.
 
The same way any AP does - you plug it in via RJ45 and in the case of the Ubiquiti kit use a PoE injector to power it. Being a separate device you normally run a cable to a central location and it can easily cover a conventional home, if you need more then you can add a pair - for example someone on here had thick stone walls and needed one either side to achieve full coverage. It gives your wifi independence from your router, single devices are cute and everything, but they're rarely the best at the job, especially as you're needs evolve.
thnx im going to have a read up on them might be worth investing in especially as we have about 13 or 14 devices connected to the wifi quite regularly

are these more or less the same as wifi repeaters like the asus wireless ac1900 repeater???
 
Repeaters, by the very nature of how they function tend to give 50% of the stated bandwidth, an AP - as it's connected via a wired connection - should give it's maximum speed depending on the server's ability to supply it or the WAN profile. Ubiquiti is the kind of commercial kit you'll find rolled out in large multi site deployments, it's proven to be capable business class hardware that's priced at a point that can make it a better choice in terms of ongoing support, stability and value than consumer hardware which often feels like abandonware (Asus being a great example), it has decent management options/interface and fits nicely with the enthusiast/prosumer market.

My personal thought process was as follows:

BT FTTC - they include 52/10 for less than the rest of the market offers 40/10 for after cash back/offers.
Modem HG612 - i'm on a Huawei cab, so I matched to what was being used, ECI works pretty much as well but as I had both I went with what worked best.
Asus AC56U - it's running 3rd party firmware, ARM based router with the same CPU/RAM as the AC68U but slower wifi and no beam forming. Neither of those are relevant to me so paying the extra would be a waste of time.
Ubiquiti Unifi AP's - I use wifi as a convenience, I don't want complaints about coverage or drop out, but the usage in the household is mobile devices, the AP is more than capable of saturating my WAN profile and handles 20-30 household devices with ease (family of four with phone/tablet/laptop etc. each, streaming device in each bedroom etc). I could have gone for the LR or faster AC versions, but speed is not a priority for me, the basic AP runs 2.4Ghz which is better for coverage and one AP covers the house, front and rear garden/drive and if i'm honest quite far away from the house.

This set-up isn't for everyone, others may prefer to go with Mikrotik or whoever they like best, the Ubiquiti EdgeRouter is a decent option as it allows for a more centralised management/reporting set-up and a one box takes up one socket/less space, but is far less optimal, if you reboot your one box to upgrade the firmware/change settings, you risk DLM, I can do that and still maintain sync, in the same way I can swap over to a Mikrotik to play with hardware VPN acceleration and my wifi will still work without having to go round each device and re-set it. Some people suggest wives and significant others complain about 'extra boxes', i've found they complain a lot more often if the wifi is poor and constantly drops out, so far no complaints.
 
Back
Top Bottom